From: Moshe B. <mo...@mo...> - 2002-10-25 23:00:39
|
You see, it's not that openMosix is unstable with gcc 3.x. It's simply not designed for this compiler, just like the Linux kernel itself. It will take some work to port to the silly gcc3.x compilers. Moshe On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 ps...@wi... wrote: > i think this would be a good time for a Gentoo developer to create a gcc/glibc toolchain ebuild, if it doesn't exist already. it could be used to compile kernels using gcc 2.9x instead of gcc 3.x the way busybox is compiled with a uClibc toolchain. i'll go bug them on irc about it and see if we can't find a simple solution for compiles on Gentoo 1.4 until OM is stable with gcc 3.x. > > just a silly comment: i tried the 2.4.10-pre11 kernel (without OM) the other day and it was quite buggy on my normally not-buggy system. one of the larger problems i had were lockups in XFree86 4.2.1 and lines being drawn on my screen after a while (NVdriver issue? pentium iii 1ghz, btw, so it's not an athlon bug). > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en > _______________________________________________ > Openmosix-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-devel > -- "Computer science is not about computers any more than astronomy is about telescopes." -- EW Dijkstra |