From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-16 12:12:33
|
Feature Requests item #1754745, was opened at 2007-07-16 14:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1754745&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Classes Group: Next Release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Collections # 4: Please define abstract methods for the "Map Initial Comment: Analyzing the "MapCollection" classes it becomes clear that all of them need to implement the method "putAll", which therefore should be defined as an abstract method for "MapCollection". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1754745&group_id=119701 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-19 12:16:02
|
Feature Requests item #1754745, was opened at 2007-07-16 08:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bigrixx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1754745&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Classes >Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Collections # 4: Please define abstract methods for the "Map Initial Comment: Analyzing the "MapCollection" classes it becomes clear that all of them need to implement the method "putAll", which therefore should be defined as an abstract method for "MapCollection". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2007-07-19 08:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1125291 Originator: NO This RFE has been examined, and has been determined to be inline with the goals of the ooRexx language. This is not a commitment that this feature will be implemented, but this will remain open until someone in the ooRexx community chooses to implement the feature. Any committer who wishes to work on this feature should assign the feature to themselves when they begin. Any non-committer who wishes to work on this should indicate their interest by adding a comment to the RFE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1754745&group_id=119701 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-24 15:22:47
|
Feature Requests item #1754745, was opened at 2007-07-16 14:12 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by orexx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1754745&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Classes Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) >Assigned to: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) Summary: Collections # 4: Please define abstract methods for the "Map Initial Comment: Analyzing the "MapCollection" classes it becomes clear that all of them need to implement the method "putAll", which therefore should be defined as an abstract method for "MapCollection". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2007-07-19 14:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1125291 Originator: NO This RFE has been examined, and has been determined to be inline with the goals of the ooRexx language. This is not a commitment that this feature will be implemented, but this will remain open until someone in the ooRexx community chooses to implement the feature. Any committer who wishes to work on this feature should assign the feature to themselves when they begin. Any non-committer who wishes to work on this should indicate their interest by adding a comment to the RFE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1754745&group_id=119701 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-24 16:20:48
|
Feature Requests item #1754745, was opened at 2007-07-16 14:12 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by orexx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1754745&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Classes Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) Assigned to: Rony G. Flatscher (orexx) Summary: Collections # 4: Please define abstract methods for the "Map Initial Comment: Analyzing the "MapCollection" classes it becomes clear that all of them need to implement the method "putAll", which therefore should be defined as an abstract method for "MapCollection". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Date: 2007-07-19 14:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1125291 Originator: NO This RFE has been examined, and has been determined to be inline with the goals of the ooRexx language. This is not a commitment that this feature will be implemented, but this will remain open until someone in the ooRexx community chooses to implement the feature. Any committer who wishes to work on this feature should assign the feature to themselves when they begin. Any non-committer who wishes to work on this should indicate their interest by adding a comment to the RFE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1754745&group_id=119701 |