From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@lu...> - 2006-06-28 18:36:06
Rick, others... happen to think of any subtle / deep changes you introduced to
ooRexx in 3.1?
I just forced the code through an entire workstation load process with beta 2,
no RxAPI service or that script DLL being registered... MichaelDist itself
(ooRexx code) did some very wild things. So, saving off complete traces / logs
and off to reload with 3.01 shortly, then diff the logs and see just how bad
things went. The more I look at the behavior of MichaelDist... it is as if you
really did toss in a 1+1=3 level feature in 3.1... and since that is "higher
level language related" I will try to dump some time into testing / tracking
down what this 3.1 code is "doing different".
Anyway, just thought I would ask in case it rins a bell of "oh yea, now we hard
enforce XYZ in the language which was not there before..." or the like. Classic
Rexx to Object Rexx that added the full syntax check... things like that.
Something that deep happen in 3.1?