From: Rick M. <obj...@gm...> - 2007-11-29 21:38:36
|
How about an option to request builds for all platforms? That way, when there are significant updates, it's a simple matter to run the sanity checks against all the platforms. If we could couple that ability with an automated test run, even better. Rick On Nov 29, 2007 4:34 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 12:53 PM, David Ashley <da...@us...> wrote: > > > > First of all let me just say that I believe that nightly builds can be a > > good thing. But, in the case of ooRexx, we just do not make enough > changes > > on a daily basis to make it worth the effort to implement a daily build > > process. > > Moritz and others, > > I agree with David on this. I think nightly builds are a good thing > under the right circumstances, but I don't think that currently they > make much sense. > > The on-demand model, I think, is best for right now. There have only > been a handful of changes to the interpreter itself in the last week. > I know there have been a lot of commits, but it has been in areas that > would not be picked up in a nightly build any way. > > -- > Mark Miesfeld > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper > from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going > mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > |