From: David R. <da...@sa...> - 2006-09-28 02:55:46
|
What if oorexx provided separate packages for the different platforms? I think the standard or pseudo-standard with the dotted versioning is: Major.minor.bugfix So we could keep all packages in sync at the major and minor levels, but each package would have its own bug fixes as needed. My $.02 ;-) Thanks, David Ruggles CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+ Network Engineer Safe Data, Inc. (910) 285-7200 da...@sa... -----Original Message----- From: oor...@li... [mailto:oor...@li...] On Behalf Of Lee = Peedin Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:54 PM To: mie...@ac...; Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Refresh of the Windows version ? The problem I see with a 3.1.1 release for just Windows puts the = SourceForge download options like=20 they were for the 3.0.0 Linux/3.0.1 Windows - SourceForge only "openly" shows the release with the=20 highest version number. Personally, I'd like to see a "Patch Download" area that could be = platform specific. Especially in=20 this case where it is one compiled .dll file. Just my 2 cents. Lee Mark Miesfeld wrote: > : [mailto:oor...@li...] On Behalf=20 > : Of Rony G. Flatscher > : Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 4:26 PM > :=20 > : Hi there, > :=20 > : unfortunatley, in the Windows version 3.1 there is a=20 > : "show-stopper" but w.r.t. the OLE/COM interface of ooRexx: > ...=20 > :=20 > : In order for deploying ooRexx 3.1 successfully in a Windows=20 > : environment these fixes need to be in the distribution. > :=20 > : Hence my suggestion to consider to create a "refresh" of the=20 > : Windows version (something like a "3.1.1").=20 >=20 > I for one am in favor of some type of refresh. =20 >=20 > A big advantage of open source is that you can get bugs fixed. But, = for > some people (maybe a lot of users) downloading from CVS and = successfully > building a project like ooRexx is not easy. It would be nice to = provide > those people with a refresh. >=20 > 1.) I am more than willing to help with building on Windows. I have = the > same set up as Mark Hessling is using (compiler and platform SDK.) >=20 > 2.) I'm not sure if this project has a documented versioning scheme, = 3.1.1 > seems "too much" to me. Unless of course 3.1.1 denotes a minor bug = fix. =20 >=20 > 3.) I'd also like to see some kind of "you don't need to upgrade to a minor > bug fix release unless you are having problems with these known, fixed bugs" > message attached. >=20 >=20 > -- > Mark Miesfeld > mie...@ac...=20 >=20 >=20 > = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to = share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn = cash > = http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share = your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oor...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel |