Re: [Ocaml-lib-devel] Re: dbi licensing

[Richard J. <ri...@an...>]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:34:46AM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Richard Jones wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:49:19PM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> The dbi library in extlib and the one here:
> >> 
> >> http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/modcaml/ocamldbi/
> >> 
> >> Seem to have different licenses. extlib claims
> >> to have an LGPL license with the ocaml exception
> >> clause, while ocamldbi claims just LGPL.
> >> 
> >> What license sticks? And which source tree is
> >> the primary tree?
> >> 
> >> I like the LGPL with exceptions, personally...
> > 
> > OcamlDBI is LGPL with linking exception, same as ExtLib.
> 
> Have you documented that? This license doesn't say anything about
> exceptions (other than those that are part of the normal LGPL):
> 
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/modcaml/ocamldbi/COPYING.LIB?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup

On the website:

http://www.merjis.com/developers/mod_caml/

... but I'm about to change the file in CVS to match.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://www.j-london.com/
Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment
If I have not seen as far as others, it is because I have been
standing in the footprints of giants.  -- from Usenet