From: Nicolas C. <war...@fr...> - 2003-06-11 02:17:52
|
> And plenty of problems with Ocaml itself. > And there are many that you won't even find yourself: > you need users to help you both find problems, > and also to prioritorise them. I agree on this one . Modern software development and Internet are enabling a quick bug reporting/fix and then users only have to update their version. About this "update" and installation-made-easy of the ExtLib, I was thinking writing a small and simple OCaml program that will check and download the last extlib version , compile using ocamake (I think perhaps we should then put ocamake in the ExtLib) and install it in 'ocamlc -where'/extlib . I would like to have some comments from Unix users to know how we can make the user being able to choose the install directory and still have a nice and portable way of retreiving the install dir (needed by Makefile of program using ExtLib at linking time). > RELEASE ExtLib within one week no matter what. > > I want to use it! I don't CARE if its bugged, > > or if the interfaces aren't right yet. Releasing with bugs is one point : theses can be fixed later. But releasing without any correct documentation IS a mistake. If users don't understand what's inside / how to use the version 1 , they'll not get "ext-addicted" :-) and will simply don't use it. If you want a quick release of ExtLib, please help with writing the documentation of existing modules ! Nicolas Cannasse |