#824 increased number of incisors

closed-rejected
Cynthia Smith
5
2010-12-10
2010-11-23
Cynthia Smith
No

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: MP term: increased number of incisors
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:26:50 -0400
From: Melissa Berry <Melissa.Berry@jax.org>
To: Cynthia Smith <csmith@informatics.jax.org>

Lrp4<mdig-2J> (per J165544) has “one or two extra upper incisors”
This does not qualify under the definition of supernumerary incisors and
there is no more appropriate term than the parent term “abnormal incisor
morphology” so that is where I’ve chucked it for now.

Discussion

  • Cynthia Smith
    Cynthia Smith
    2010-12-10

    It is appropriate to put this under "supernumerary incisors". I have clarified the definition.

     
  • Cynthia Smith
    Cynthia Smith
    2010-12-10

    • status: open --> closed-rejected