From: Frank L. <fra...@go...> - 2009-05-31 17:07:21
|
2009/5/31 Andrew Morgan <mo...@or...>: > On Fri, 29 May 2009, Frank Lahm wrote: > >>> Also, I see that a PDF version of the manual was built for 2.0.3. Is >>> this >>> something we want to continue doing for 2.0.4? >> >> I haven't really looked into how much mumbo-jumbo it would be to >> generate a PDF. But as the docbook XML stuff and toolchain regularly >> turn out to be a pita, I'll refrain from volunteering for this job. >> Besides that: who needs a PDF version? > > Actually, the PDF version is quite nice. It sure would print out a lot > easier than trying to print all the HTML pages. :) > > I found the following web page for generating a PDF file from Docbook: > > http://www.linuxfocus.org/English/May2000/article152.shtml > > It looks quite straightforward. Yeah! At the beginning and then, when one thinks everything's great: > I've been trying to generate one myself, but it isn't coming out right... Hua! Be asured, I know what it feels like. ;o))) > I'm not sure who generated the last PDF file, but maybe they can speak up > and let us know how they did it. Yes please. But I dont expect them to step up. Imo having the man and html part working agaid is good enough. Best Regards -Frank |