Re: [Netatalk-devel] netatalk 2.0.4 status

[Frank L. <fra...@go...>]

Hi,

2009/1/22 didier <dga...@ma...>:
> - CJK code :(
> ...
> I don't know if it's likely though, it's only in corner cases.

How likely is it? Do you have an example. If these are just corner
cases I'd vote for including it and fix problems with 2.0.5.

> - Documentation
> ---------------
> The documentation build system is lost but it needs update for new options.

I've looked at it. I was able to to some changes and generate html
(including netatalk site header) that looks like the existing one. I
am using `xmlto` on Debian. I guess its a similar setup to what was
used for the 2.0.3 manual. I've written a README that documents the
necessary steps.
I've attached the html output where I've documented DHX2, the README,
the XSL config file and a sed file. These files should eventually be
included in CVS.
Afaics only some meta tags etc. are missing which can be added easily.

-Frank