Re: [Ndiswrapper-general] Problems with Intel Wireless 2100 3B
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
pgiri
From: Tomas S. <sz...@pi...> - 2004-01-05 17:56:47
|
On Jan-05 2004, Mon, 12:52 -0500 Navindra Umanee <nav...@cs...> wrote: > Tomas Szepe <sz...@pi...> wrote: > > Methods? Pardon my ignorance -- are Windows device drivers written in C++? > > Are the M$ folks _that_ stupid? > > Isn't the whole Windows NT kernel (and derivatives) in C++? Not sure, that's why I'm asking. I'd find that thoroughly silly. > IIRC, there was a time when the Linux developers considered switching > to C++ but had to back off because GCC C++ support was inadequate. > > Nothing stupid about it... :) Many a stupid thing about it, really. :) There is a nice, explanatory narration about the whole "Linux kernel to be rewritten in C++" story in the Linux kernel mailing list FAQ. It lists many reasons why trying to do systems programming in C++ is A Bad Idea(tm). I've just pasted the exact link into another post. -- Tomas Szepe <sz...@pi...> |