From: H. P. A. <hp...@zy...> - 2007-11-04 19:04:29
|
Charles Crayne wrote: > > In the case of fs: and gs:, we ignore the global default for rip > relative addressing, which I think is the correct behavior, but > silently attempt to honor a specific rel request -- which is almost > certain to be incorrect. At the least, we should issue a stern warning. > > What thinkest thou? > I think a suppressible warning should be ideal here. We should not override a *specific* user request. -hpa |