Re: [nant-dev] SUBMISSION: Path Task

[Ian M. <ianm@ActiveState.com>]

Yeah,
And now we have an excellent definition of what should be a task and 
what should be a function - that we can add to the docs. One of us needs 
to play devils advocate - quite often its been me :).

Ian

Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:

>>PS.  Sorry if I sometimes sound negative about expression support ... I
>>really like and appreciate what you've done so far, but I just want to be
>>sure we're doing the right thing and not let you guys get carried away in
>>your enthousiasm too fast :-)  But I agree that its really exciting stuff,
>>and I hope to find time soon enough to dive in as well ...
>>    
>>
>
>Actually your comments are very helpful. Keep them coming ;-) You convinced
>me and Ian that we should support properties with dashes and functions with
>the syntax: prefix::function-name-with-dashes().
>
>Jarek
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
>Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
>help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>_______________________________________________
>nant-developers mailing list
>nan...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>  
>