Re: [nail-devel] ..on cherry-picked bugfixes

[Steffen D. N. <sd...@gm...>]

Wuuhuuuu!  Hi!!

jca...@wx... (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) wrote:
 |Steffen "Daode" Nurpmeso <sd...@gm...> writes:
 |> not at last because i don't know of any packaged S-nail.
 |
 |I assumed you were aware of this, but there is an OpenBSD port[1], which
 |has replaced[2] Heirloom mailx.  We can of course integrate those patches
 |in the 14.2 port, so you don't need to post a maintenance release if
 |you don't want to.  Just tell us if you change your opinion, so that
 |William (the port maintainer) or I don't submit a useless patch.

No i didn't know that!
I call back when the hyperventilation stops…

 |[1] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=136452928921103&w=2
 |[2] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=136452953721136&w=2

Grazy.
So then maybe i should send the next minor release entirely in
small appetizing patches… haha…
No, hrm, no. (:)

So this is something else.
Question: what do you think is the best option?
I could tag and release a 14.2.1 or so, but i would also be fine
if you or William (cool!) would adjust that via DISTNAME (which
i think was the mechanism, but i never made it to @openbsd.org ;).
…And tomorrow OpenBSD 5.3 will be released!
Hmm.  Please let me know what you think!

 |-- 
 |Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
 |PGP Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90  8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494

--steffen