From: Steve Freeman <steve@m3...> - 2004-02-26 10:37:37
Thanks. It was long overdue but I haven't been working on Dynamo for a
while. Now the kicker... We're spending most of our time working on
jmock, our new dynamic implementation, and it might be best to consider
that for infrastructure. We won't pull the existing SF project, so
you're welcome to have your change contributed there.
Probably the best thing is to upload your source into the patch
mechanism (everything please, not just the diffs).
Anyone else want to get involved?
Will Sargent wrote:
> I've got pretty huge patches to the mockobjects-atg codebase. I've
> added a mock repository, ant build script, unit tests for the mock
> repository, and I've cleaned up the code so it has consistent formatting
> and headers.
> Should I just send in the zip file, or would it be better to send a cvs
> diff on all the files? The ATG Dynamo stuff doesn't have any
> attribution, so it's difficult to know who did what.
From: Will Sargent <will_sargent@ya...> - 2004-02-26 10:55:46
Steve Freeman wrote:
> Probably the best thing is to upload your source into the patch
> mechanism (everything please, not just the diffs).
Done. I'm not really looking at the dynamic proxy implementation -- I
mostly did this just to find out when and where unit testing was