Re: and source q. (Re: [Mixmaster-devel] latest mix3 draft?)

[Len S. <ra...@ab...>]

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Adam Back wrote:

> So a follow on q. about the source on sourceforge it says:
>
> | The current 2.9.x versions are stable and widely deployed. The
> | 3.0beta* releases are betas for the upcoming Mixmaster 3.0.
>
> Are all of 2.0x, 2.9x, and 3.0bx using version 2 format (not version
> 3)?

Yes, though Mixmaster 2.0.3 through some of the early 2.0.4bXX versions
did not implement the timestamp, and are now depricated.

Mixmaster 4.0 will interoperate with Mixminion, and will speak the "Type
III" protocol, as described in the Mixminion specification document.

> >From deployed remailers I see following unique versions (what does
> 2:<vers> mean as opposed to <vers>?):

(See Peter's response).

[snip]

Is there a question about the version list?