Re: [misterhouse-users] As we approach v3.00

[Robert R. <ro...@fr...>]

Hi,

I'm thinking more of other way. Each user has its own remote control
(whatever it is) and you can always know from where you receive its
signal...

Regards,

Robert.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neil Wrightson" <ne...@nw...>
To: <mis...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 5:07 AM
Subject: RE: [misterhouse-users] As we approach v3.00


> Hi All,
>
> Have I missed this or does MH support individual users.
>
> What I would like to see is
> Recognition of individual users on a system. RFID style or similar would
be
> great.
> But I'm happy with them logging into MH at this stage.
>
> Each user could then have specific events attached to them.
> For example when an individual user logs onto the system
> 1) Relevant Voice Messages could be piped to them
> i.e. tell my son it's garbage day and to put out the garbage
>
> 2) Alarm clock function for each user. I know I have a great habit of
> hitting the alarm when it rings and then promptly falling back to sleep.
> But if MH detected that there was no movement in the bathroom within a
> specified period of time after it sounded the alarm,
> then sound the alarm again.
>
> 3) Config callerID for individual members of the household.
> That way the family members would be notified of calls that had come in
> specifically for them.
>
> etc.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil.
>
>