From: Greg C. <chi...@mi...> - 2003-05-16 19:50:50
|
Shouldn't the copyright date be 2003, not 2002? C:/tmp[0]$g++ --version g++.EXE (GCC) 3.2.3 (mingw special 20030425-1) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. I'm running a patched 3.2.3 prerelease, so maybe the formal release differs in this respect. |
From: Danny S. <dan...@cl...> - 2003-05-17 01:13:58
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Chicares" <chi...@mi...> To: "mingw-users" <min...@li...> Sent: Friday, 16 May 2003 20:52 Subject: [Mingw-users] gcc-3.2.3 copyright date: 2002? > Shouldn't the copyright date be 2003, not 2002? > > C:/tmp[0]$g++ --version > g++.EXE (GCC) 3.2.3 (mingw special 20030425-1) > Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > I'm running a patched 3.2.3 prerelease, so maybe > the formal release differs in this respect. > > It's like that in the FSF 3.2.3 as well. It was finally fixed here: 2003-05-06 Mark Mitchell <ma...@co...> PR other/10658 * gcc.c (process_command): Update copyright date. Too late for 3.2.3 Danny > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users |