Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] Why add add bogus definitions to namespace?

[Earnie B. <ea...@us...>]

Never mind, I'm working a different patch that should satisfy us both.

<quote who="Earnie Boyd">
> <quote who="Danny Smith">
>>
>> So why pollute the C global namespace when you could just add
>>
>> <sample>
>>
>> #ifndef ELOOP
>> #define ELOOP 90
>> #endif
>>
>> to your sample.
>>
>> Actally I would prefer that that S_ISLINK and lstat  be handled the same
>> way.
>>
>
> I tend to think that if we can aid porting UNIX programs with a little
> pollution why not?
>
> Others opinion please?  I may forward to the users list for their opinion
> as well.
>
> Earnie
>
> --
> http://www.mingw.org
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw
> https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438
>


Earnie

--
http://www.mingw.org
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw
https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438