From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-02-06 21:03:08
|
Danny Smith wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Earnie Boyd" <ear...@ya...> > To: <min...@li...> > Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2003 11:45 > Subject: Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] _CRTIMP problem > > > >>Danny Smith wrote: >> >>>No, I'll fix in my local patchset and apply to CVS as soon as >>>mingw-runtime version is bumped >>> >> >>Are there any outstanding issues? >> > > None to my knowledge. I intended to wait till after release before > adding the vscanf functions contributted by Aaron (AWLaFramboise). > Great, I'll prepare a release this weekend. I'll do w32api as well while I'm at it. And I would like to do a MinGW-2.0.1.exe release; but which GCC should I use? Which binutils? > Basic tests with these vscanf functions have all succeeded. Having > them in runtime modifies how libstdc++ is built. With them, the > configury finally says yes: > #define _GLIBCPP_USE_C99 1 > exposes all the C99 functions and promotes them to namespace std. Nice. What other mingwex extentions should we consider? Maybe, a working ftell, fscan, etc.? Earnie. |