From: F. <j_r...@ya...> - 2002-11-08 14:47:34
|
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:01:49AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: > I've added manubee to the list of developers and have associated > ma...@us... with the mingw-dvlpr mailing list. If you > wish to post messages with a different account please let me know. > > Work with Kees on the package layout. The ports subdirectory has > already been added but is empty. I will look at the web pages to decide > what/how w.r.t. promoting MinGW ports. The MinGW ports maintenance, > implementation and distribution belong to you and Kees. I think that this MinGW native ports is a great thing. Unfortunately I no longer have the time or need for such ports, but I once had and spent alot of time and effort in producing the ports available at http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/gnu-win32/software/ported . Although most packages there are now outdated, special care was taken then to deal with the line-endings and other details as explained in the above page. So I think that the diffs of the changes made by me at the time (which were in many cases based on the analysis of the diffs of other ports available then) are still valuable for this effort. So I've put them all on http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/gnu-win32/software/ported/ for your convenience. BTW, the convention taken regarding the line endings was: - read/write hand-written files (configuration files, scripts, etc.) in text mode - read/write raw data files (input/output streams) in binary. Of course that the later is arguable, and probably doesn't make much sense nowadays with the availabilty of MSYS for building unix stuff. It all depends of what you want to do with the ports. José Fonseca __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com |