From: Eli Z. <el...@gn...> - 2014-12-13 08:18:07
|
> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 04:15:28 +0100 > From: Emanuel Falkenauer <E.F...@op...> > > I do concur with Wu (my sincere apologies if you prefer Yongwei!): > > On 13-Dec-14 03:38, Yongwei Wu wrote: > > On 12 December 2014 at 16:11, Eli Zaretskii <el...@gn...> wrote: > >>> Now "playing with fire" it was indeed, to set up everything to be able > >>> to make (and run) both versions without problems... > >> That's exactly what I meant. You've got to do what you've got to do, > >> but you should also know what kind of trouble you are getting yourself > >> in. > > Well the thing is that it was "playing with fire" to have the two > bitnesses of *MinGW* cohabitate... but all flavours of OUR dlls (i.e. > our output) are named differently - precisely in order to avoid loading > the wrong one. ;-) Which means you need to rebuild all of the DLLs you rely upon to name them differently. That's not a practical thing to expect of the MinGW users. |