Menu
▾
▴
[MinGW-notify] [ mingw-Bugs-3520864 ] GCC won't install
|
From: SF/projects/mingw n. l. <min...@li...> - 2012-04-25 11:18:15
|
Bugs item #3520864, was opened at 2012-04-23 22:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by keithmarshall You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=3520864&group_id=2435 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: mingw-get Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Love4Boobies (love4boobies) Assigned to: Charles Wilson (cwilso11) Summary: GCC won't install Initial Comment: Hi, I don't know whether this is true for any other package, but GCC was not installed although I selected the "C compiler" option in mingw-get-inst (the latest release: 20120421), while attempting a clean installation. I don't know whether this is a mingw-get or a mingw-get-inst bug, though. Cheers, Bogdan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Keith Marshall (keithmarshall) Date: 2012-04-25 04:18 Message: Hmm. No bug reports at all, between the release of mingw-get-0.5 and the corresponding mingw-get-inst release, then, like omnibuses, three come along together. However, that may be a red herring, with mingw-get-inst simply being the catalyst to get those 'buses out of the garage. I assigned to you, Chuck, to ensure it didn't slip under your radar -- IIRC, you said that you don't religiously monitor the trackers. Armed with Albrecht Schlosser's detailed follow-up on the ML, and your own logs, I'm focusing attention back on mingw-get itself. It seems that the fix for bugs #3416013 and #3424406 has introduced a regression, whereby *some* packages are being scheduled for installation, without asserting the associated "download pending" flag; that should always be set at schedule time, for install or upgrade, then subsequently cleared on successful completion of the download, or on confirmation that the requisite package archive is already present in the local package cache. I'll follow-up anyway, but I'll leave it to you to assign back to me, in case you wish to activate ticket monitoring beforehand. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Charles Wilson (cwilso11) Date: 2012-04-24 22:03 Message: Here are the two commands invoked by mingw-get-inst: C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c mingw-get.exe update 2>&1 | "C:\MinGW-test\libexec\mingw-get\tee.exe" "C:\MinGW-test\var\log\mingw-get-log.orig.txt" and then C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c mingw-get.exe install mingw-get pkginfo base gcc-core 2>&1 | "C:\MinGW-test\libexec\mingw-get\tee.exe" -a "C:\MinGW-test\var\log\mingw-get-log.orig.txt" I've attached two logs. The first ("Setup...") is created by mingw-get-inst itself (when you launch it with the /LOG option). The second is the result of those 'tee' commands above. It is apparent that, for some reason, mingw-get doesn't bother to download all of the necessary elements of 'base' and 'gcc-core' -- but then *pretends* to unpack them all the same. Unless I've messed up the command line, this seems to be a bug in mingw-get itself. For good measure, I repeated the experiment using mingw-get alone, without mingw-get-inst (and without the extra " 2>&1 | tee -a logfile" stuff -- that is: /c/Windows/system32/cmd.exe /c mingw-get.exe update /c/Windows/system32/cmd.exe /c mingw-get.exe install mingw-get pkginfo base gcc-core The behavior was unchanged: some obvious elements were not downloaded at all, but a pretense of unpacking and installing these missing tarballs was reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Earnie Boyd (earnie) Date: 2012-04-24 05:03 Message: See also https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=202435&aid=3520698&group_id=2435 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keith Marshall (keithmarshall) Date: 2012-04-24 01:39 Message: I'm inclined to suspect a mingw-get-inst problem; mingw-get itself WJFFM, (and GCC is one of the packages I've tested on, exhaustively, before the 0.5-beta release). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=3520864&group_id=2435 |