From: Tim S. <sta...@ve...> - 2008-02-03 01:29:45
|
wil...@be... wrote: > Brian Dessent wrote: > >> Furthermore, it may consitute a license violation of the GPL if you >> were to link GPL code to MSVCR71.DLL because it would be creating a >> combined work that is not GPL. The only reason that this is >> permissable when linking to MSVCRT.DLL is that the GPL contains an >> exception clause for "components of thee operating system" which >> MSVCRT is but the other versions are not. > > So I may have to explode my head :) . I'll wait until Sir Richard > knocks on the door. > Would this be a valid work around? Write an LGPL DLL that links to MSVCR71.DLL. Then link the GPL DLL to the LGPL DLL. Or, would that not fix the licence issue? Tim S |