From: Wu Y. <ad...@ne...> - 2003-12-01 02:58:22
|
Danny, It seems the guy just built the packages without making changes, and he provided links to all the original sites. According to my understanding (which might be wrong) of the GPL, I doubt it is not a violation. Best regards, Wu Yongwei --- Original Message from Danny Smith --- > http://www63.tok2.com/home/bitwalk/download.html > > > I am having trouble upgrading to gcc3.3.1 with the official packages, but can > with this one. It is from a credible supplier? > The 'unofficial' packages you mention may be credible and have all good intenstions, but they violate the GPL because as far as I can see, they do not provide sources. If the bitwalk does not correct this, I intend to report to the FSF GPL vioation site. Danny |