Re: tm and MH-E 8

[Mike K. <m.k...@ac...>]

>>>>> "Bill" == Bill Wohler <wo...@ne...> writes:

Bill> How does MH-E break tm? I agree that MH-E shouldn't break other
Bill> packages. If we (you ;-) can fix those issues, that would be most
Bill> welcome.

Compilation bombs out with

    While compiling toplevel forms:
      !! File error (("Cannot open load file" "tm-mh-e3"))  

due to this bit in tm-mh-e.el:

    (require 'mh-e)
    (or (featurep 'mh-utils)
        (require 'tm-mh-e3)
        )

I already have a note to look into autoloads and what (require 'mh-e)
should do.  So I suppose if addressing that issue fixes the tm problem
at the same time, I won't try to do any surgery on tm.

Speaking of which, what *is* the interface that other packages should
use for loading MH-E?  If I understand correctly, 

    (require 'mh-e) 

was sufficient for MH-E 7, but MH-E 8 on XEmacs seems to require

    (require 'mh-autoloads)

Is that the new interface, then?  Can you sketch for me why it's no
longer (require 'mh-e)?

thanks,
mike