From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20111027 22:05:21

Bugs item #3398066, was opened at 20110825 18:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by crategus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Simplification Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Anton Voropaev (antonvoropaev) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: See also bug report ID: 2990192 INPUT build_info(); display2d : false; radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); INPUT AND OUTPUT (%i1) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.25.0 Maxima build date: 12:0 8/2/2011 Host type: i686pcmingw32 Lisp implementation type: Clozure Common Lisp Lisp implementation version: Version 1.7r14925M (WindowsX8632) (%o1) (%i2) display2d : false; (%o2) false (%i3) radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); rat: replaced 1.5 by 3/2 = 1.5 (%o3) sqrt(2^(3/2)+1)/sqrt(2)  >Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20111028 00:05 Message: Fixed in compar.lisp revision 27.10.2011 Closing this bug report as fixed. Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20111026 22:58 Message: This bug is related to the bug 3185855  radcan warns about floatconvert. It is the same problem. A correction is to modify the function numer in the file compar.lisp. See bug 3185855. Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20110826 20:17 Message: It seems to come from csign or sign. radcan calls simpexpt which calls csign which eventually calls numer. I don't know if csign should be trying to convert the expression to a numerical result. Could be a bug in numer too.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20100421 00:18:37

Bugs item #2990192, was opened at 20100420 19:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by willisbl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: I think %o21 is correct, but the messages about rat replacing 1.0 by 1/1 make me nervous: (%o20) ((240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70)21*10^(3/2)) *sqrt(1/(358400*%pi))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) (%i21) radcan(%); rat: replaced 1.0 by 1/1 = 1.0 (%o21) 0  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20100426 22:34:00

Bugs item #2990192, was opened at 20100421 02:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by crategus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: I think %o21 is correct, but the messages about rat replacing 1.0 by 1/1 make me nervous: (%o20) ((240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70)21*10^(3/2)) *sqrt(1/(358400*%pi))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) (%i21) radcan(%); rat: replaced 1.0 by 1/1 = 1.0 (%o21) 0  >Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20100427 00:34 Message: I do not get the reported message sbcl 1.0.29.11 and the current cvs version: (%o20) (21*10^(3/2)(240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) /(160*sqrt(14)*sqrt(%pi)) (%i21) radcan(expr); (%o21) 0 The option variable ratprint has the default value TRUE. Dieter Kaiser  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20100429 01:25:54

Bugs item #2990192, was opened at 20100420 20:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: I think %o21 is correct, but the messages about rat replacing 1.0 by 1/1 make me nervous: (%o20) ((240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70)21*10^(3/2)) *sqrt(1/(358400*%pi))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) (%i21) radcan(%); rat: replaced 1.0 by 1/1 = 1.0 (%o21) 0  >Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20100428 21:25 Message: I don't see rat messages either with cmucl, clisp, or clozure cl with current cvs. However, I do remember seeing this sometime in the last week or two, but I don't have those sources around anymore.  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20100426 18:34 Message: I do not get the reported message sbcl 1.0.29.11 and the current cvs version: (%o20) (21*10^(3/2)(240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) /(160*sqrt(14)*sqrt(%pi)) (%i21) radcan(expr); (%o21) 0 The option variable ratprint has the default value TRUE. Dieter Kaiser  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20100509 21:53:09

Bugs item #2990192, was opened at 20100421 02:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by crategus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: I think %o21 is correct, but the messages about rat replacing 1.0 by 1/1 make me nervous: (%o20) ((240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70)21*10^(3/2)) *sqrt(1/(358400*%pi))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) (%i21) radcan(%); rat: replaced 1.0 by 1/1 = 1.0 (%o21) 0  >Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20100509 23:53 Message: As reported in the last postings this error seems to be no longer present. Setting the status to pending and the resolution to "works for me". Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20100429 03:25 Message: I don't see rat messages either with cmucl, clisp, or clozure cl with current cvs. However, I do remember seeing this sometime in the last week or two, but I don't have those sources around anymore.  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20100427 00:34 Message: I do not get the reported message sbcl 1.0.29.11 and the current cvs version: (%o20) (21*10^(3/2)(240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) /(160*sqrt(14)*sqrt(%pi)) (%i21) radcan(expr); (%o21) 0 The option variable ratprint has the default value TRUE. Dieter Kaiser  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20100524 02:20:30

Bugs item #2990192, was opened at 20100421 00:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sfrobot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: I think %o21 is correct, but the messages about rat replacing 1.0 by 1/1 make me nervous: (%o20) ((240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70)21*10^(3/2)) *sqrt(1/(358400*%pi))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) (%i21) radcan(%); rat: replaced 1.0 by 1/1 = 1.0 (%o21) 0  >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sfrobot) Date: 20100524 02:20 Message: This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker).  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20100509 21:53 Message: As reported in the last postings this error seems to be no longer present. Setting the status to pending and the resolution to "works for me". Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20100429 01:25 Message: I don't see rat messages either with cmucl, clisp, or clozure cl with current cvs. However, I do remember seeing this sometime in the last week or two, but I don't have those sources around anymore.  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20100426 22:34 Message: I do not get the reported message sbcl 1.0.29.11 and the current cvs version: (%o20) (21*10^(3/2)(240*sqrt(7)30*7^(3/2))*sqrt(70))*sin(x)^4*%e^(3*%i*y) /(160*sqrt(14)*sqrt(%pi)) (%i21) radcan(expr); (%o21) 0 The option variable ratprint has the default value TRUE. Dieter Kaiser  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2990192&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20110825 16:31:24

Bugs item #3398066, was opened at 20110825 20:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by antonvoropaev You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Simplification Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Anton Voropaev (antonvoropaev) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: See also bug report ID: 2990192 INPUT build_info(); display2d : false; radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); INPUT AND OUTPUT (%i1) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.25.0 Maxima build date: 12:0 8/2/2011 Host type: i686pcmingw32 Lisp implementation type: Clozure Common Lisp Lisp implementation version: Version 1.7r14925M (WindowsX8632) (%o1) (%i2) display2d : false; (%o2) false (%i3) radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); rat: replaced 1.5 by 3/2 = 1.5 (%o3) sqrt(2^(3/2)+1)/sqrt(2)  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20110826 18:17:49

Bugs item #3398066, was opened at 20110825 12:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Simplification Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Anton Voropaev (antonvoropaev) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: See also bug report ID: 2990192 INPUT build_info(); display2d : false; radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); INPUT AND OUTPUT (%i1) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.25.0 Maxima build date: 12:0 8/2/2011 Host type: i686pcmingw32 Lisp implementation type: Clozure Common Lisp Lisp implementation version: Version 1.7r14925M (WindowsX8632) (%o1) (%i2) display2d : false; (%o2) false (%i3) radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); rat: replaced 1.5 by 3/2 = 1.5 (%o3) sqrt(2^(3/2)+1)/sqrt(2)  >Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20110826 14:17 Message: It seems to come from csign or sign. radcan calls simpexpt which calls csign which eventually calls numer. I don't know if csign should be trying to convert the expression to a numerical result. Could be a bug in numer too.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20111026 20:58:07

Bugs item #3398066, was opened at 20110825 18:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by crategus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Simplification Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Anton Voropaev (antonvoropaev) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: See also bug report ID: 2990192 INPUT build_info(); display2d : false; radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); INPUT AND OUTPUT (%i1) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.25.0 Maxima build date: 12:0 8/2/2011 Host type: i686pcmingw32 Lisp implementation type: Clozure Common Lisp Lisp implementation version: Version 1.7r14925M (WindowsX8632) (%o1) (%i2) display2d : false; (%o2) false (%i3) radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); rat: replaced 1.5 by 3/2 = 1.5 (%o3) sqrt(2^(3/2)+1)/sqrt(2)  >Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20111026 22:58 Message: This bug is related to the bug 3185855  radcan warns about floatconvert. It is the same problem. A correction is to modify the function numer in the file compar.lisp. See bug 3185855. Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20110826 20:17 Message: It seems to come from csign or sign. radcan calls simpexpt which calls csign which eventually calls numer. I don't know if csign should be trying to convert the expression to a numerical result. Could be a bug in numer too.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20111027 22:05:21

Bugs item #3398066, was opened at 20110825 18:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by crategus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Simplification Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Anton Voropaev (antonvoropaev) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: radcan generates floats? Initial Comment: See also bug report ID: 2990192 INPUT build_info(); display2d : false; radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); INPUT AND OUTPUT (%i1) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.25.0 Maxima build date: 12:0 8/2/2011 Host type: i686pcmingw32 Lisp implementation type: Clozure Common Lisp Lisp implementation version: Version 1.7r14925M (WindowsX8632) (%o1) (%i2) display2d : false; (%o2) false (%i3) radcan(sqrt(sqrt(2)+1/2)); rat: replaced 1.5 by 3/2 = 1.5 (%o3) sqrt(2^(3/2)+1)/sqrt(2)  >Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20111028 00:05 Message: Fixed in compar.lisp revision 27.10.2011 Closing this bug report as fixed. Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20111026 22:58 Message: This bug is related to the bug 3185855  radcan warns about floatconvert. It is the same problem. A correction is to modify the function numer in the file compar.lisp. See bug 3185855. Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20110826 20:17 Message: It seems to come from csign or sign. radcan calls simpexpt which calls csign which eventually calls numer. I don't know if csign should be trying to convert the expression to a numerical result. Could be a bug in numer too.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3398066&group_id=4933 