From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20100527 22:57:56

Bugs item #3008215, was opened at 20100528 00:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by crategus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3008215&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Derivatives of the Inverse Jacobi functions Initial Comment: The noun form of the derivatives of the inverse Jacobi functions is wrong for 9 of the 12 functions when we have not a simple argument m. These are some examples for the function inverse_jacobi_ns: (%i1) diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,2*m),m,1); (%o1) 2*'diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,2*m),2*m,1) (%i2) diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,m/2),m,1); (%o2) 'diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,m/2),m/2,1)/2 (%i3) diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,a*m),m,1); (%o3) a*'diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,a*m),a*m,1) The problem is, that we have the noun form of a derivative on the property list, but Maxima can not handle this case correctly. We get the expected results when we put NIL on the property list: (%i9) diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,2*m),m); (%o9) 'diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,2*m),m,1) (%i10) diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,m/2),m); (%o10) 'diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,m/2),m,1) (%i11) diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,a*m),m); (%o11) 'diff(inverse_jacobi_ns(u,a*m),m,1) Dieter Kaiser  >Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20100528 00:57 Message: Closing this bug report as a duplicate of Bug report ID: 3008183. Dieter Kaiser  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3008215&group_id=4933 