## maxima-bugs

 [Maxima-bugs] [ maxima-Bugs-3539220 ] Definite Integral yields zero value From: SourceForge.net - 2012-07-01 01:06:08 ```Bugs item #3539220, was opened at 2012-06-30 18:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by mukundnaik You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3539220&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core - Integration Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: Yes Submitted By: MukundNaik (mukundnaik) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Definite Integral yields zero value Initial Comment: build_info("5.27.0","2012-05-08 11:27:57","i686-pc-mingw32","GNU Common Lisp (GCL)","GCL 2.6.8") m1(x):=(1-cos(%pi*x))*(1-cos(%pi*x*2/3))*(1-cos(%pi*x*2/5))*(1-cos(%pi*x*2/7))/16; wxplot2d([m1(x)], [x,32,36], [y,0,0.6], [gnuplot_preamble, "set grid;"])\$ romberg(m1(x), x, 32, 36); yields Zero. The plot above shows that it is not zero everywhere in the region 32-36. In fact, romberg(m1(x), x, 32, 33) = 0.051305498551289 romberg(m1(x), x, 33, 34)=0.016230140453864 romberg(m1(x), x, 34, 35)=0.0014305334087985 romberg(m1(x), x, 35, 36)=2.3489482722215246*10^-4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=3539220&group_id=4933 ```