You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 
_{Jan}

_{Feb}

_{Mar}

_{Apr}

_{May}

_{Jun}
(67) 
_{Jul}
(61) 
_{Aug}
(49) 
_{Sep}
(43) 
_{Oct}
(59) 
_{Nov}
(24) 
_{Dec}
(18) 

2003 
_{Jan}
(34) 
_{Feb}
(35) 
_{Mar}
(72) 
_{Apr}
(42) 
_{May}
(46) 
_{Jun}
(15) 
_{Jul}
(64) 
_{Aug}
(62) 
_{Sep}
(22) 
_{Oct}
(41) 
_{Nov}
(57) 
_{Dec}
(56) 
2004 
_{Jan}
(48) 
_{Feb}
(47) 
_{Mar}
(33) 
_{Apr}
(39) 
_{May}
(6) 
_{Jun}
(17) 
_{Jul}
(19) 
_{Aug}
(10) 
_{Sep}
(14) 
_{Oct}
(74) 
_{Nov}
(80) 
_{Dec}
(22) 
2005 
_{Jan}
(43) 
_{Feb}
(33) 
_{Mar}
(52) 
_{Apr}
(74) 
_{May}
(32) 
_{Jun}
(58) 
_{Jul}
(18) 
_{Aug}
(41) 
_{Sep}
(71) 
_{Oct}
(28) 
_{Nov}
(65) 
_{Dec}
(68) 
2006 
_{Jan}
(54) 
_{Feb}
(37) 
_{Mar}
(82) 
_{Apr}
(211) 
_{May}
(69) 
_{Jun}
(75) 
_{Jul}
(279) 
_{Aug}
(139) 
_{Sep}
(135) 
_{Oct}
(58) 
_{Nov}
(81) 
_{Dec}
(78) 
2007 
_{Jan}
(141) 
_{Feb}
(134) 
_{Mar}
(65) 
_{Apr}
(49) 
_{May}
(61) 
_{Jun}
(90) 
_{Jul}
(72) 
_{Aug}
(53) 
_{Sep}
(86) 
_{Oct}
(61) 
_{Nov}
(62) 
_{Dec}
(101) 
2008 
_{Jan}
(100) 
_{Feb}
(66) 
_{Mar}
(76) 
_{Apr}
(95) 
_{May}
(77) 
_{Jun}
(93) 
_{Jul}
(103) 
_{Aug}
(76) 
_{Sep}
(42) 
_{Oct}
(55) 
_{Nov}
(44) 
_{Dec}
(75) 
2009 
_{Jan}
(103) 
_{Feb}
(105) 
_{Mar}
(121) 
_{Apr}
(59) 
_{May}
(103) 
_{Jun}
(82) 
_{Jul}
(67) 
_{Aug}
(76) 
_{Sep}
(85) 
_{Oct}
(75) 
_{Nov}
(181) 
_{Dec}
(133) 
2010 
_{Jan}
(107) 
_{Feb}
(116) 
_{Mar}
(145) 
_{Apr}
(89) 
_{May}
(138) 
_{Jun}
(85) 
_{Jul}
(82) 
_{Aug}
(111) 
_{Sep}
(70) 
_{Oct}
(83) 
_{Nov}
(60) 
_{Dec}
(16) 
2011 
_{Jan}
(61) 
_{Feb}
(16) 
_{Mar}
(52) 
_{Apr}
(41) 
_{May}
(34) 
_{Jun}
(41) 
_{Jul}
(57) 
_{Aug}
(73) 
_{Sep}
(21) 
_{Oct}
(45) 
_{Nov}
(50) 
_{Dec}
(28) 
2012 
_{Jan}
(70) 
_{Feb}
(36) 
_{Mar}
(71) 
_{Apr}
(29) 
_{May}
(48) 
_{Jun}
(61) 
_{Jul}
(44) 
_{Aug}
(54) 
_{Sep}
(20) 
_{Oct}
(28) 
_{Nov}
(41) 
_{Dec}
(137) 
2013 
_{Jan}
(62) 
_{Feb}
(55) 
_{Mar}
(31) 
_{Apr}
(23) 
_{May}
(54) 
_{Jun}
(54) 
_{Jul}
(90) 
_{Aug}
(46) 
_{Sep}
(38) 
_{Oct}
(60) 
_{Nov}
(92) 
_{Dec}
(17) 
2014 
_{Jan}
(62) 
_{Feb}
(35) 
_{Mar}
(72) 
_{Apr}
(30) 
_{May}
(97) 
_{Jun}
(81) 
_{Jul}
(63) 
_{Aug}
(64) 
_{Sep}
(28) 
_{Oct}
(27) 
_{Nov}

_{Dec}

S  M  T  W  T  F  S 

1
(2) 
2
(6) 
3
(7) 
4
(2) 
5
(9) 
6
(14) 
7
(10) 
8
(6) 
9
(12) 
10
(1) 
11
(4) 
12
(9) 
13
(5) 
14
(18) 
15

16
(3) 
17
(3) 
18
(3) 
19
(1) 
20
(2) 
21
(5) 
22
(14) 
23
(2) 
24
(5) 
25
(1) 
26

27
(4) 
28
(8) 
29
(17) 
30
(8) 





From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20091104 20:46:04

Bugs item #2890315, was opened at 20091101 09:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mitreude You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2890315&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Integration Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: mitreuden (mitreude) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2) answer Initial Comment: The first time integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2) is executed, the answer of %pi/3 returned is correct. However, when the integral is computed again, an incorrect answer of 4*%pi/3 is returned.  >Comment By: mitreuden (mitreude) Date: 20091104 14:45 Message: OK, I examined the file trgsmp.mac and found that if I changed the order of simplification rules in the definition of the function trigsimp(),I can consistently get the correct answer. Here is what I did: load(trgsmp)$ defrule(trigrule1,sec(a),1/cos(a))$ defrule(trigrule2,csc(a),1/sin(a))$ defrule(trigrule3,tan(a),sin(a)/cos(a))$ defrule(trigrule4,cot(a),cos(a)/sin(a))$ defrule(htrigrule1,sech(a),1/cosh(a))$ defrule(htrigrule2,csch(a),1/sinh(a))$ defrule(htrigrule3,tanh(a),sinh(a)/cosh(a))$ defrule(htrigrule4,coth(a),cosh(a)/sinh(a))$ trigsimp(x):=trigsimp3(ratsimp(apply1(x,trigrule4,trigrule1,trigrule2,trigrule3,trigrule4, htrigrule1,htrigrule2,htrigrule3,htrigrule4)))$ integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); It seems that the tangent simplification should not come first. Why this works on this particular problem, I don't have a clue. Also, might changing the simplification order cause a problem in an integral where Maxima previously found the correct answer? I have more questions than answers. Mike Treuden  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20091104 11:01 Message: Sorry, you are correct. My working tree had a fix for Bug 2880797. Why this makes a difference, I don't know.  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20091103 16:21 Message: I can see this bug too with CLISP 2.44 and Maxima 5.19post on my Linux system: (%i2) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o2) %pi/3 (%i3) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o3) 4*%pi/3 Evaluating this integral the package trgsmp is loaded: (%i5) functions; (%o5) [trigonometricp(exp),trigsimp(x),trigsimp3(expn),trigsimp1(expn), improve(expn,subsofar,listoftrigsq),listoftrigsq(expn), specialunion(list1,list2),update(form,complement),expnlength(expr), argslength(args)] When I kill the functions defined by this package the integral is correct again: (%i6) kill(functions); (%o6) done (%i7) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o7) %pi/3 And the next evaluation is wrong again: (%i8) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o8) 4*%pi/3 When I preload the package trgsmp I get the error immediately: (%i11) kill(functions); (%o11) done (%i12) load(trgsmp); (%o12) "/usr/local/share/maxima/5.19post/share/trigonometry/trgsmp.mac" (%i13) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o13) 4*%pi/3 Reopening the bug report. Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20091102 10:25 Message: Neat bug. But current cvs returns %pi/3 both times. Do not know what has changed, but it seems current CVS has fixed this issue. Marking as pending/worksforme  Comment By: mitreuden (mitreude) Date: 20091101 21:46 Message: This problem occurs with version 5.19.2 of Maxima.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2890315&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20091104 17:01:57

Bugs item #2890315, was opened at 20091101 10:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2890315&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Integration Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: mitreuden (mitreude) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2) answer Initial Comment: The first time integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2) is executed, the answer of %pi/3 returned is correct. However, when the integral is computed again, an incorrect answer of 4*%pi/3 is returned.  >Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20091104 12:01 Message: Sorry, you are correct. My working tree had a fix for Bug 2880797. Why this makes a difference, I don't know.  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20091103 17:21 Message: I can see this bug too with CLISP 2.44 and Maxima 5.19post on my Linux system: (%i2) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o2) %pi/3 (%i3) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o3) 4*%pi/3 Evaluating this integral the package trgsmp is loaded: (%i5) functions; (%o5) [trigonometricp(exp),trigsimp(x),trigsimp3(expn),trigsimp1(expn), improve(expn,subsofar,listoftrigsq),listoftrigsq(expn), specialunion(list1,list2),update(form,complement),expnlength(expr), argslength(args)] When I kill the functions defined by this package the integral is correct again: (%i6) kill(functions); (%o6) done (%i7) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o7) %pi/3 And the next evaluation is wrong again: (%i8) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o8) 4*%pi/3 When I preload the package trgsmp I get the error immediately: (%i11) kill(functions); (%o11) done (%i12) load(trgsmp); (%o12) "/usr/local/share/maxima/5.19post/share/trigonometry/trgsmp.mac" (%i13) integrate(cot(x)^4,x,%pi/6,%pi/2); (%o13) 4*%pi/3 Reopening the bug report. Dieter Kaiser  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20091102 11:25 Message: Neat bug. But current cvs returns %pi/3 both times. Do not know what has changed, but it seems current CVS has fixed this issue. Marking as pending/worksforme  Comment By: mitreuden (mitreude) Date: 20091101 22:46 Message: This problem occurs with version 5.19.2 of Maxima.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2890315&group_id=4933 