You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 
_{Jan}

_{Feb}

_{Mar}

_{Apr}

_{May}

_{Jun}
(67) 
_{Jul}
(61) 
_{Aug}
(49) 
_{Sep}
(43) 
_{Oct}
(59) 
_{Nov}
(24) 
_{Dec}
(18) 

2003 
_{Jan}
(34) 
_{Feb}
(35) 
_{Mar}
(72) 
_{Apr}
(42) 
_{May}
(46) 
_{Jun}
(15) 
_{Jul}
(64) 
_{Aug}
(62) 
_{Sep}
(22) 
_{Oct}
(41) 
_{Nov}
(57) 
_{Dec}
(56) 
2004 
_{Jan}
(48) 
_{Feb}
(47) 
_{Mar}
(33) 
_{Apr}
(39) 
_{May}
(6) 
_{Jun}
(17) 
_{Jul}
(19) 
_{Aug}
(10) 
_{Sep}
(14) 
_{Oct}
(74) 
_{Nov}
(80) 
_{Dec}
(22) 
2005 
_{Jan}
(43) 
_{Feb}
(33) 
_{Mar}
(52) 
_{Apr}
(74) 
_{May}
(32) 
_{Jun}
(58) 
_{Jul}
(18) 
_{Aug}
(41) 
_{Sep}
(71) 
_{Oct}
(28) 
_{Nov}
(65) 
_{Dec}
(68) 
2006 
_{Jan}
(54) 
_{Feb}
(37) 
_{Mar}
(82) 
_{Apr}
(211) 
_{May}
(69) 
_{Jun}
(75) 
_{Jul}
(279) 
_{Aug}
(139) 
_{Sep}
(135) 
_{Oct}
(58) 
_{Nov}
(81) 
_{Dec}
(78) 
2007 
_{Jan}
(141) 
_{Feb}
(134) 
_{Mar}
(65) 
_{Apr}
(49) 
_{May}
(61) 
_{Jun}
(90) 
_{Jul}
(72) 
_{Aug}
(53) 
_{Sep}
(86) 
_{Oct}
(61) 
_{Nov}
(62) 
_{Dec}
(101) 
2008 
_{Jan}
(100) 
_{Feb}
(66) 
_{Mar}
(76) 
_{Apr}
(95) 
_{May}
(77) 
_{Jun}
(93) 
_{Jul}
(103) 
_{Aug}
(76) 
_{Sep}
(42) 
_{Oct}
(55) 
_{Nov}
(44) 
_{Dec}
(75) 
2009 
_{Jan}
(103) 
_{Feb}
(105) 
_{Mar}
(121) 
_{Apr}
(59) 
_{May}
(103) 
_{Jun}
(82) 
_{Jul}
(67) 
_{Aug}
(76) 
_{Sep}
(85) 
_{Oct}
(75) 
_{Nov}
(181) 
_{Dec}
(133) 
2010 
_{Jan}
(107) 
_{Feb}
(116) 
_{Mar}
(145) 
_{Apr}
(89) 
_{May}
(138) 
_{Jun}
(85) 
_{Jul}
(82) 
_{Aug}
(111) 
_{Sep}
(70) 
_{Oct}
(83) 
_{Nov}
(60) 
_{Dec}
(16) 
2011 
_{Jan}
(61) 
_{Feb}
(16) 
_{Mar}
(52) 
_{Apr}
(41) 
_{May}
(34) 
_{Jun}
(41) 
_{Jul}
(57) 
_{Aug}
(73) 
_{Sep}
(21) 
_{Oct}
(45) 
_{Nov}
(50) 
_{Dec}
(28) 
2012 
_{Jan}
(70) 
_{Feb}
(36) 
_{Mar}
(71) 
_{Apr}
(29) 
_{May}
(48) 
_{Jun}
(61) 
_{Jul}
(44) 
_{Aug}
(54) 
_{Sep}
(20) 
_{Oct}
(28) 
_{Nov}
(41) 
_{Dec}
(137) 
2013 
_{Jan}
(62) 
_{Feb}
(55) 
_{Mar}
(31) 
_{Apr}
(23) 
_{May}
(54) 
_{Jun}
(54) 
_{Jul}
(90) 
_{Aug}
(46) 
_{Sep}
(38) 
_{Oct}
(60) 
_{Nov}
(92) 
_{Dec}
(17) 
2014 
_{Jan}
(62) 
_{Feb}
(35) 
_{Mar}
(72) 
_{Apr}
(30) 
_{May}
(97) 
_{Jun}
(81) 
_{Jul}
(63) 
_{Aug}
(64) 
_{Sep}
(28) 
_{Oct}
(45) 
_{Nov}
(48) 
_{Dec}
(109) 
2015 
_{Jan}
(106) 
_{Feb}
(36) 
_{Mar}
(4) 
_{Apr}

_{May}

_{Jun}

_{Jul}

_{Aug}

_{Sep}

_{Oct}

_{Nov}

_{Dec}

S  M  T  W  T  F  S 






1
(4) 
2
(1) 
3
(1) 
4
(2) 
5
(7) 
6
(7) 
7
(1) 
8
(6) 
9

10
(3) 
11
(1) 
12
(2) 
13
(11) 
14
(1) 
15
(5) 
16

17

18
(2) 
19
(10) 
20
(2) 
21
(2) 
22
(3) 
23
(2) 
24
(6) 
25
(2) 
26
(6) 
27
(2) 
28
(10) 
29
(1) 
30

31
(3) 






From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 17:02:53

Bugs item #2793906, was opened at 20090519 17:11 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by riotorto You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793906&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Plotting Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: BeCase (becase) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plot2d: nonnumeric value Initial Comment: Maxima 5.18.1, SBCL 1.0.25 Try to exec next code: showtime:true$ C1:125000$ C2:15$ Q:2000$ P:1/4$ F(b):=integrate(%e^(s^2/(2*Q^2)),s,minf,b)$ f(x):=((1P)*C1*(1F(x)) + P*C2*Q*(x/2 + 2*%pi/4) * F(x/2  sqrt(2*%pi)/4)); plot2d(f,[x,3000,2990]); And we get: plot2d: expression evaluates to nonnumeric value everywhere in plotting range. plot2d: nothing to plot. Evaluation took 3140.9800 seconds (3539.6040 elapsed) using 23500.930 MB. (%o8) false Mathematica don't have this bug and calculate this at seconds.  Comment By: BeCase (becase) Date: 20090519 18:46 Message: Thanks, it works :)  Comment By: Mario Rodriguez Riotorto (riotorto) Date: 20090519 18:42 Message: try plot2d(f(x),[x,3000,2990]);  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793906&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 16:46:29

Bugs item #2793906, was opened at 20090519 15:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by becase You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793906&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Plotting Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: Remind Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: BeCase (becase) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plot2d: nonnumeric value Initial Comment: Maxima 5.18.1, SBCL 1.0.25 Try to exec next code: showtime:true$ C1:125000$ C2:15$ Q:2000$ P:1/4$ F(b):=integrate(%e^(s^2/(2*Q^2)),s,minf,b)$ f(x):=((1P)*C1*(1F(x)) + P*C2*Q*(x/2 + 2*%pi/4) * F(x/2  sqrt(2*%pi)/4)); plot2d(f,[x,3000,2990]); And we get: plot2d: expression evaluates to nonnumeric value everywhere in plotting range. plot2d: nothing to plot. Evaluation took 3140.9800 seconds (3539.6040 elapsed) using 23500.930 MB. (%o8) false Mathematica don't have this bug and calculate this at seconds.  >Comment By: BeCase (becase) Date: 20090519 16:46 Message: Thanks, it works :)  Comment By: Mario Rodriguez Riotorto (riotorto) Date: 20090519 16:42 Message: try plot2d(f(x),[x,3000,2990]);  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793906&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 16:42:15

Bugs item #2793906, was opened at 20090519 17:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by riotorto You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793906&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Plotting Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Remind Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: BeCase (becase) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plot2d: nonnumeric value Initial Comment: Maxima 5.18.1, SBCL 1.0.25 Try to exec next code: showtime:true$ C1:125000$ C2:15$ Q:2000$ P:1/4$ F(b):=integrate(%e^(s^2/(2*Q^2)),s,minf,b)$ f(x):=((1P)*C1*(1F(x)) + P*C2*Q*(x/2 + 2*%pi/4) * F(x/2  sqrt(2*%pi)/4)); plot2d(f,[x,3000,2990]); And we get: plot2d: expression evaluates to nonnumeric value everywhere in plotting range. plot2d: nothing to plot. Evaluation took 3140.9800 seconds (3539.6040 elapsed) using 23500.930 MB. (%o8) false Mathematica don't have this bug and calculate this at seconds.  >Comment By: Mario Rodriguez Riotorto (riotorto) Date: 20090519 18:42 Message: try plot2d(f(x),[x,3000,2990]);  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793906&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 15:11:11

Bugs item #2793906, was opened at 20090519 15:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by becase You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793906&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Plotting Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: BeCase (becase) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plot2d: nonnumeric value Initial Comment: Maxima 5.18.1, SBCL 1.0.25 Try to exec next code: showtime:true$ C1:125000$ C2:15$ Q:2000$ P:1/4$ F(b):=integrate(%e^(s^2/(2*Q^2)),s,minf,b)$ f(x):=((1P)*C1*(1F(x)) + P*C2*Q*(x/2 + 2*%pi/4) * F(x/2  sqrt(2*%pi)/4)); plot2d(f,[x,3000,2990]); And we get: plot2d: expression evaluates to nonnumeric value everywhere in plotting range. plot2d: nothing to plot. Evaluation took 3140.9800 seconds (3539.6040 elapsed) using 23500.930 MB. (%o8) false Mathematica don't have this bug and calculate this at seconds.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793906&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 14:30:42

Bugs item #2793888, was opened at 20090519 16:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by raniuale You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793888&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Differential eqns Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Renato AlvarezNodarse (raniuale) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: additional package dynamics Initial Comment: The dynamic package does not work properly. The commands orbits, evolution, staircase and chaosgame etc do not accept any opctions including the ones used in the documentation. The problems is that the way os passing the options to plot2d fails. I include some examples: (%i12) evolution(cos(y), 2, 11, [yaxislabel, "y"], [xaxislabel,"n"]); Unknown plot option specified: yaxislabel #0: evolution(fun=cos(y),initial=2,n=11,options=[[yaxislabel,"y"],[xaxislabel,"n"]])(dynamics.mac line 54)  an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); Unknown plot option specified: real #0: staircase(fun=cos(y),initial=1,n=11,options=[[real,0,1.2]])(dynamics.mac line 96)  an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); (%i14) orbits(x+y^2, 0, 100, 400, [x,1,1.53,0.001], [pointsize,0.9],[ycenter,1.2], [yradius,0.4]); Graph passed to plot2d... Unknown plot option specified: pointsize #0: orbits(f=y^2+x,y0=0,n1=100,n2=400,domain=[x,1,1.53,0.001],options=[[pointsize,0.9],[ycenter,1.2],[yradius,0.4]])(dynamics.mac line 367)  an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); (%i15) chaosgame([[0, 0], [1, 0], [0.5, sqrt(3)/2]], [0.1, 0.1], 1/2, 30000, [pointsize,0.7]); Unknown plot option specified: pointsize #0: chaosgame(point=[[0,0],[1,0],[0.5,0.86602540378444]],p0=[0.1,0.1],b=0.5,n=30000,options=[[pointsize,0.7]])(dynamics.mac line 195)  an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); Cheers, Renato (ran@...) Renato  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793888&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 13:58:58

Bugs item #2793827, was opened at 20090519 08:14 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793827&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Integration Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Andrej Vodopivec (andrejv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: internal error in integrate Initial Comment: We get an error in integrate: (%i24) expr: ((g32475^n*(n*g32475n1))/(g324751)^2+1/(g324751)^2)/(1g32475)  (g32475^(n+1)/(g324751)^2+(g32475^(2*n+1)*(n*g32475n1))/(g324751)^2)/(1g32475)$ (%i25) integrate(expr, g32475, 0, 1); Maxima encountered a Lisp error: Argument Y is not a NUMBER: NIL. Automatically continuing. To reenable the Lisp debugger set *debuggerhook* to nil. Maxima can compute the integral if expr is simplified: (%i26) integrate(ratsimp(expr), g32475, 0, 1); Is n positive, negative, or zero?pos; (%o26) (n+1)^2/21/2  Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 20090519 09:56 Message: Bug is in behavior in src/limit.lisp. Fixed in limit.lisp, rev. 1.69  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793827&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 13:57:01

Bugs item #2793827, was opened at 20090519 12:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793827&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Integration Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Andrej Vodopivec (andrejv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: internal error in integrate Initial Comment: We get an error in integrate: (%i24) expr: ((g32475^n*(n*g32475n1))/(g324751)^2+1/(g324751)^2)/(1g32475)  (g32475^(n+1)/(g324751)^2+(g32475^(2*n+1)*(n*g32475n1))/(g324751)^2)/(1g32475)$ (%i25) integrate(expr, g32475, 0, 1); Maxima encountered a Lisp error: Argument Y is not a NUMBER: NIL. Automatically continuing. To reenable the Lisp debugger set *debuggerhook* to nil. Maxima can compute the integral if expr is simplified: (%i26) integrate(ratsimp(expr), g32475, 0, 1); Is n positive, negative, or zero?pos; (%o26) (n+1)^2/21/2  Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 20090519 13:56 Message: Bug is in behavior in src/limit.lisp. Fixed in limit.lisp, rev. 1.69  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793827&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 13:51:18

Bugs item #2793868, was opened at 20090519 15:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by franco68tn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793868&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: FrancoB (franco68tn) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Additivity of integration on intervals Initial Comment: It seems like Maxima doesn't know of the property of additivity of integration on intervals. It is unable to evaluate the following integral: (%i1) integrate(exp(abs(x)),x,1,+inf); (%o1) integrate(%e^(abs(x)),x,1,inf) If we divide the integral over two intervals, Maxima can perform the calculation: (%i2) integrate(exp(abs(x)),x,1,0)+integrate(exp(abs(x)),x,0,+inf); (%o2) 2%e^(1) Franco B.  Maxima version: 5.18.1 Maxima build date: 20:57 4/19/2009 host type: i686pcmingw32 lispimplementationtype: GNU Common Lisp (GCL) lispimplementationversion: GCL 2.6.8   You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793868&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 12:14:57

Bugs item #2793827, was opened at 20090519 14:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by andrejv You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793827&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core  Integration Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Andrej Vodopivec (andrejv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: internal error in integrate Initial Comment: We get an error in integrate: (%i24) expr: ((g32475^n*(n*g32475n1))/(g324751)^2+1/(g324751)^2)/(1g32475)  (g32475^(n+1)/(g324751)^2+(g32475^(2*n+1)*(n*g32475n1))/(g324751)^2)/(1g32475)$ (%i25) integrate(expr, g32475, 0, 1); Maxima encountered a Lisp error: Argument Y is not a NUMBER: NIL. Automatically continuing. To reenable the Lisp debugger set *debuggerhook* to nil. Maxima can compute the integral if expr is simplified: (%i26) integrate(ratsimp(expr), g32475, 0, 1); Is n positive, negative, or zero?pos; (%o26) (n+1)^2/21/2  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2793827&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20090519 02:20:25

Bugs item #2784167, was opened at 20090430 06:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sfrobot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2784167&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Tests Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Kenneth Sloan (kennethrsloan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 101 & 139 fail MacOSX Initial Comment:  Maxima version: 5.18.1 Maxima build date: 14:34 4/18/2009 host type: i686appledarwin8.11.1 lispimplementationtype: CMU Common Lisp lispimplementationversion: 19f (19F)  ********************** Problem 101 *************** Input: ev(e5, au = 0, omega = 2) Result: [0.4, 2.104312740630307e12, 225, 0] This differed from the expected result: [.4000000000000001, 2.216570948815925e11, 175, 0] ********************** Problem 139 *************** Input: expintegral_chi(z)  conjugate(expintegral_chi(conjugate(z))) Result: 0.0339413106060743  .07647309974404348 %i This differed from the expected result: 0.0  >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sfrobot) Date: 20090519 02:20 Message: This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker).  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20090504 14:45 Message: Ok. Since this appears not to be repeatable, I'm marking this as Pending/Works For Me. If there's any additional information, please update this bug report.  Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 20090501 17:48 Message: ($i1) run_testsuite(); ... No unexpected errors found. ; Evaluation took: ; 162.15f0 seconds of real time ; 133.21613f0 seconds of user run time ; 20.53623f0 seconds of system run time ; 350,844,228,618 CPU cycles ; [Run times include 9.95f0 seconds GC run time] ; 0 page faults and ; 9,363,027,080 bytes consed. ; (%o0) done Now *that* is interesting... I'd like to say "nevermind"  but now I'm very puzzled. Just for completeness: (%i1) z:0.5+%i; (%o1) %i + 0.5 (%i2) expintegral_chi(z); (%o2) 1.341686846905066 %i + .4971469507996198 (%i3) conjugate(expintegral_chi(conjugate(z))); (%o3) 1.341686846905066 %i + .4971469507996198 and (%i7) 0.5*(expintegral_e(1,z)+expintegral_e(1,z)+log(z)log(z)); (%o7)  0.5 ( 2.683373693810132 %i  .9942939015992396) (%i8) expand(%); (%o8) 1.341686846905066 %i + .4971469507996198 This seems to match your results (except for a bit more precision). At this point, I have no idea how the first test_suite() went wrong, and can't replicate it. Chalk it up to a gravity wave.  Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 20090501 17:28 Message: I'm using the MacOSX build  not building from source. I ran the entire test suite  these were the only two errors. Working on the numerical results in response to the previous comment, now.  Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 20090501 17:01 Message: I ran the entire testsuite using CMUCL 200904 on Mac OS X 10.5 with the current CVS code. I do not get any test failures either. Did you run the entire testsuite or just parts of it?  Comment By: Dieter Kaiser (crategus) Date: 20090501 14:36 Message: Hello Kenneth, I cannot verify the failures with GCL 2.6.8 and CLISP 2.44. There might be problem with the numericial calculations of expintegral_chi which is special to your Lisp implementation. For the problem 139 in rtest_expintegral.mac I get the following numerical results with CLISP 2.44: (%i12) z:0.5+%i; (%o12) %i + 0.5 (%i13) expintegral_chi(z); (%o13) 1.341686846905066 %i + 0.49714695079962 (%i14) conjugate(expintegral_chi(conjugate(z))); (%o14) 1.341686846905066 %i + 0.49714695079962 Internally, the following formula for the calculation is used: (%i20) 0.5*(expintegral_e(1,z)+expintegral_e(1,z)+log(z)log(z)); (%o20)  0.5 ( 2.683373693810132 %i  0.99429390159924) (%i21) expand(%); (%o21) 1.341686846905066 %i + 0.49714695079962 Can you post your numerical results. Dieter Kaiser  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=2784167&group_id=4933 