You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 
_{Jan}

_{Feb}

_{Mar}

_{Apr}

_{May}

_{Jun}
(67) 
_{Jul}
(61) 
_{Aug}
(49) 
_{Sep}
(43) 
_{Oct}
(59) 
_{Nov}
(24) 
_{Dec}
(18) 

2003 
_{Jan}
(34) 
_{Feb}
(35) 
_{Mar}
(72) 
_{Apr}
(42) 
_{May}
(46) 
_{Jun}
(15) 
_{Jul}
(64) 
_{Aug}
(62) 
_{Sep}
(22) 
_{Oct}
(41) 
_{Nov}
(57) 
_{Dec}
(56) 
2004 
_{Jan}
(48) 
_{Feb}
(47) 
_{Mar}
(33) 
_{Apr}
(39) 
_{May}
(6) 
_{Jun}
(17) 
_{Jul}
(19) 
_{Aug}
(10) 
_{Sep}
(14) 
_{Oct}
(74) 
_{Nov}
(80) 
_{Dec}
(22) 
2005 
_{Jan}
(43) 
_{Feb}
(33) 
_{Mar}
(52) 
_{Apr}
(74) 
_{May}
(32) 
_{Jun}
(58) 
_{Jul}
(18) 
_{Aug}
(41) 
_{Sep}
(71) 
_{Oct}
(28) 
_{Nov}
(65) 
_{Dec}
(68) 
2006 
_{Jan}
(54) 
_{Feb}
(37) 
_{Mar}
(82) 
_{Apr}
(211) 
_{May}
(69) 
_{Jun}
(75) 
_{Jul}
(279) 
_{Aug}
(139) 
_{Sep}
(135) 
_{Oct}
(58) 
_{Nov}
(81) 
_{Dec}
(78) 
2007 
_{Jan}
(141) 
_{Feb}
(134) 
_{Mar}
(65) 
_{Apr}
(49) 
_{May}
(61) 
_{Jun}
(90) 
_{Jul}
(72) 
_{Aug}
(53) 
_{Sep}
(86) 
_{Oct}
(61) 
_{Nov}
(62) 
_{Dec}
(101) 
2008 
_{Jan}
(100) 
_{Feb}
(66) 
_{Mar}
(76) 
_{Apr}
(95) 
_{May}
(77) 
_{Jun}
(93) 
_{Jul}
(103) 
_{Aug}
(76) 
_{Sep}
(42) 
_{Oct}
(55) 
_{Nov}
(44) 
_{Dec}
(75) 
2009 
_{Jan}
(103) 
_{Feb}
(105) 
_{Mar}
(121) 
_{Apr}
(59) 
_{May}
(103) 
_{Jun}
(82) 
_{Jul}
(67) 
_{Aug}
(76) 
_{Sep}
(85) 
_{Oct}
(75) 
_{Nov}
(181) 
_{Dec}
(133) 
2010 
_{Jan}
(107) 
_{Feb}
(116) 
_{Mar}
(145) 
_{Apr}
(89) 
_{May}
(138) 
_{Jun}
(85) 
_{Jul}
(82) 
_{Aug}
(111) 
_{Sep}
(70) 
_{Oct}
(83) 
_{Nov}
(60) 
_{Dec}
(16) 
2011 
_{Jan}
(61) 
_{Feb}
(16) 
_{Mar}
(52) 
_{Apr}
(41) 
_{May}
(34) 
_{Jun}
(41) 
_{Jul}
(57) 
_{Aug}
(73) 
_{Sep}
(21) 
_{Oct}
(45) 
_{Nov}
(50) 
_{Dec}
(28) 
2012 
_{Jan}
(70) 
_{Feb}
(36) 
_{Mar}
(71) 
_{Apr}
(29) 
_{May}
(48) 
_{Jun}
(61) 
_{Jul}
(44) 
_{Aug}
(54) 
_{Sep}
(20) 
_{Oct}
(28) 
_{Nov}
(41) 
_{Dec}
(137) 
2013 
_{Jan}
(62) 
_{Feb}
(55) 
_{Mar}
(31) 
_{Apr}
(23) 
_{May}
(54) 
_{Jun}
(54) 
_{Jul}
(90) 
_{Aug}
(46) 
_{Sep}
(38) 
_{Oct}
(60) 
_{Nov}
(92) 
_{Dec}
(17) 
2014 
_{Jan}
(62) 
_{Feb}
(35) 
_{Mar}
(72) 
_{Apr}
(30) 
_{May}
(97) 
_{Jun}
(81) 
_{Jul}
(63) 
_{Aug}
(64) 
_{Sep}
(28) 
_{Oct}
(45) 
_{Nov}
(48) 
_{Dec}
(109) 
2015 
_{Jan}
(106) 
_{Feb}
(36) 
_{Mar}
(65) 
_{Apr}
(63) 
_{May}
(95) 
_{Jun}
(56) 
_{Jul}
(48) 
_{Aug}
(55) 
_{Sep}
(100) 
_{Oct}
(57) 
_{Nov}
(32) 
_{Dec}

S  M  T  W  T  F  S 



1
(3) 
2

3
(2) 
4

5

6
(2) 
7
(9) 
8
(6) 
9
(1) 
10

11
(8) 
12
(11) 
13
(1) 
14
(5) 
15
(1) 
16
(1) 
17

18

19
(5) 
20

21

22
(1) 
23
(1) 
24
(1) 
25
(3) 
26

27

28
(1) 
29
(2) 
30

31



From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20030719 14:20:22

Bugs item #707627, was opened at 20030322 04:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by billingd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=707627&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stavros Macrakis (macrakis) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problems with '' in documentation Initial Comment: Twosinglequotes ('') in texinfo files normally represent doubleclosequote. There are three cases where this is incorrect in the Maxima texi files: the documentation for doublesingle quote itself (in Command.texi) and the docs for DEFINE and TRANSLATE_FILE (function.texi). Presumably there is some way to quote them, but I don't know texinfo conventions.... Note that within code examples (@example) double singlequote is correctly preserved, and in literature citations (e.g. in Numerical.texi) is it being used correctly.  >Comment By: David Billinghurst (billingd) Date: 20030720 00:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=365569 Forgot to say it was fixed  Comment By: David Billinghurst (billingd) Date: 20030720 00:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=365569 Karl Berry, the texinfo maintainer, recommended '@w{}' Patches applied 20030719.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=707627&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20030719 14:19:16

Bugs item #679437, was opened at 20030203 22:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by billingd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=679437&group_id=4933 Category: Documentation Group: None Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Billinghurst (billingd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: DEFINE documentation Initial Comment: From http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2002/002 789.html The docu says  Function: DEFINE (f(x1, ...), body) is equivalent to f(x1,...):="body but when used inside functions it happens at execution time rather than at the time of definition of the function which contains it. Asside from the fact that " should (globally, at least also in "Introduction to Command Line") be replaced by '', define(f(x),Block([],local(f),Map(lambda([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x])); returns f(x) := f[x] and f(x):=''Block([],local(f),Map(lambda([x,y],f[x]:y),[1,3,5], [2,5,1]),f[x]); returns f(x):=BLOCK([],LOCAL(f),MAP(LAMBDA([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x]) so, it seems that this is not really an equivalence. In fact, it seems to me that '' doen't do anything in this context. Furthermore g():= f(x):=''Block([],local(f),Map(lambda([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x]); (as well as the same statement without '' ) makes g(); return f(x):=BLOCK([],LOCAL(f),MAP(LAMBDA([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x]) (and now f is defined), while g():=define(f(x),Block([],local(f),Map(lambda([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x])); makes g(); return f(x):=f[x] (which is what I expected) So, I think the docu should say something like  Function: DEFINE (f(x1, ...), body) is equivalent to f(x1,...):=evaluated_body, where evaluated_body is the evaluation of body.  >Comment By: David Billinghurst (billingd) Date: 20030720 00:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=365569 Forgot to say it was fixed  Comment By: David Billinghurst (billingd) Date: 20030719 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=365569 Suggested change made to Function.texi  Comment By: Stavros Macrakis (macrakis) Date: 20030708 07:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=588346 The problem here is that ''f(x) is not equivalent to ''(f(x)). The documenation should say ...is equivalent to f(x1,...):=''(body) Now, WHY is ''f(x) not equivalent to ''(f(x))? Well, that is in my opinion a design error, but since it is documented under '', I suppose it can't be considered a bug.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=679437&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20030719 14:05:12

Bugs item #707627, was opened at 20030322 04:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by billingd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=707627&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stavros Macrakis (macrakis) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problems with '' in documentation Initial Comment: Twosinglequotes ('') in texinfo files normally represent doubleclosequote. There are three cases where this is incorrect in the Maxima texi files: the documentation for doublesingle quote itself (in Command.texi) and the docs for DEFINE and TRANSLATE_FILE (function.texi). Presumably there is some way to quote them, but I don't know texinfo conventions.... Note that within code examples (@example) double singlequote is correctly preserved, and in literature citations (e.g. in Numerical.texi) is it being used correctly.  >Comment By: David Billinghurst (billingd) Date: 20030720 00:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=365569 Karl Berry, the texinfo maintainer, recommended '@w{}' Patches applied 20030719.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=707627&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20030719 13:58:00

Bugs item #679437, was opened at 20030203 22:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by billingd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=679437&group_id=4933 Category: Documentation Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Billinghurst (billingd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: DEFINE documentation Initial Comment: From http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2002/002 789.html The docu says  Function: DEFINE (f(x1, ...), body) is equivalent to f(x1,...):="body but when used inside functions it happens at execution time rather than at the time of definition of the function which contains it. Asside from the fact that " should (globally, at least also in "Introduction to Command Line") be replaced by '', define(f(x),Block([],local(f),Map(lambda([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x])); returns f(x) := f[x] and f(x):=''Block([],local(f),Map(lambda([x,y],f[x]:y),[1,3,5], [2,5,1]),f[x]); returns f(x):=BLOCK([],LOCAL(f),MAP(LAMBDA([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x]) so, it seems that this is not really an equivalence. In fact, it seems to me that '' doen't do anything in this context. Furthermore g():= f(x):=''Block([],local(f),Map(lambda([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x]); (as well as the same statement without '' ) makes g(); return f(x):=BLOCK([],LOCAL(f),MAP(LAMBDA([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x]) (and now f is defined), while g():=define(f(x),Block([],local(f),Map(lambda([x,y],f[x]:y), [1,3,5],[2,5,1]),f[x])); makes g(); return f(x):=f[x] (which is what I expected) So, I think the docu should say something like  Function: DEFINE (f(x1, ...), body) is equivalent to f(x1,...):=evaluated_body, where evaluated_body is the evaluation of body.  >Comment By: David Billinghurst (billingd) Date: 20030719 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=365569 Suggested change made to Function.texi  Comment By: Stavros Macrakis (macrakis) Date: 20030708 07:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=588346 The problem here is that ''f(x) is not equivalent to ''(f(x)). The documenation should say ...is equivalent to f(x1,...):=''(body) Now, WHY is ''f(x) not equivalent to ''(f(x))? Well, that is in my opinion a design error, but since it is documented under '', I suppose it can't be considered a bug.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=679437&group_id=4933 
From: SourceForge.net <noreply@so...>  20030719 05:36:12

Bugs item #774065, was opened at 20030719 01:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=774065&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stavros Macrakis (macrakis) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: taylor returns zeroa Initial Comment: taylor(x/log(x),x,inf,1) returns (zeroa+1/log(x)+...)*x+... I believe that 'zeroa' is intended to be strictly internal. Substituting 0 for zeroa gives the correct result.  You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=774065&group_id=4933 