From: Roland Becker <roland@at...> - 2013-06-17 09:15:10
There are one or more developers needed which
a) have time for it
b) are able to speak fluent English (certainly not me)
I hope someone will do the job as the podcast might help to find some more
Most episodes feature the primary developer or developers of a particular
open source software project. The show is an open discussion, with the host
and co-host asking questions about the nature of the project. Typically, the
interviewers will ask the guests about the history of the project, and its
development model (such as which language it is written in, which version
control system is used, and what development environment the author uses).
> Robert Munteanu <robert.munteanu@...> hat am 17. Juni 2013 um 09:38
> Why wouldn't we :-) ?
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Roland Becker <roland@...> wrote:
> > Do we like to Mantis-BT to appear on FLOSS weekly - an open source podcast?
> > What do you think?
> > http://www.mantisbt.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21463
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> > Build for Windows Store.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > mantisbt-dev mailing list
> > mantisbt-dev@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev
From: Roland Becker <roland@at...> - 2013-06-17 16:49:25
You don't have to invest a lot of time, there is already a prompter for the
> Damien Regad <damien@...> hat am 17. Juni 2013 um 18:05 geschrieben:
> On 17 June 2013 11:15, Roland Becker <roland@...> wrote:
> > There are one or more developers needed which
> > a) have time for it
> That's the catch indeed.
> While I agree on principle that any additional exposure would be nice
> and could bring some benefits to us, I am a bit concerned about
> agreeing to do something without knowing exactly what we (I) would be
> stepping into, and then find out it's not really feasible e.g. due to
> time zone difference, format of interview, etc.
> > b) are able to speak fluent English (certainly not me)
> I could handle the English-speaking part ;-)
> In short, I think it would be nice if we could get a bit more detailed
> accurate information on their expectations, than what's listed on