Re: [Madwifi-users] Card won't transmit?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
otaku
From: Andrew <ae...@co...> - 2004-04-28 05:32:14
|
Michael Renzmann wrote: > Hi. > > Andrew wrote: > >> ``iwconfig ath0 channel 6" > > > Normally you don't need to specify a channel. While the card is in > managed mode, it will choose a channel automatically. > >> ``iwconfig ath0 essid HOME" > > > You set the essid to HOME here, but... > > > iwlist scanning: > > ath0 Scan completed : > > Cell 01 - Address: 00:50:F2:73:3C:32 > > ESSID:"tjhumphrey-home" > > Cell 02 - Address: 00:09:5B:86:C1:44 > > ESSID:"NETGEAR" > > ... you don't have any AP running with that essid. Therefor you should > either change the essid to any (which should cause the card to choose > one among all those available APs, that allow association without > explicit knowledge of the essid), or to one of the two listed above > ("tjhumphrey-home" or "NETGEAR" - caution, case sensitive!). I have the SSID broadcast turned off on my router. Would that be a problem? > > Something else worth mentioning: > > > iwlist ap: > > ath0 Peers/Access-Points in range: > > 00:50:F2:73:3C:32 : Quality:4/0 Signal level:-91 dBm Noise > > level:-95 dBm (updated) > > 00:09:5B:86:C1:44 : Quality:2/0 Signal level:-93 dBm Noise > > level:-95 dBm (updated) > > You have damn bad signals from those two APs. The signal is just above > the noise level, so it's very hard for your card to determine if a > packet has been sent by the AP. The result is an instable connection > (if any) with very low speed and lots of retransmissions. You might > want to place the antenna of your card at another place, or use a > better antenna instead. What's the distance between you and those two > APs? > >> Here is iwconfig now: >> >> ath0 IEEE 802.11g ESSID:"HOME" Mode:Managed >> Frequency:2.417GHz Access Point: FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF Bit >> Rate:1Mb/s Tx-Power=16 dBm Sensitivity=0/0 Retry:off >> RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off >> Encryption key:<24-digit hex key> Security mode:open >> Power Management:off >> Link Quality:0/0 Signal level:-95 dBm Noise level:-95 dBm >> Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 >> Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 > > > The line with "Access Point: FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF" says: your card has no > association with any AP, ... > >> ath0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:09:5B:C8:3C:B5 inet >> addr:192.168.0.3 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:1074 errors:2854 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2849 >> TX packets:22 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:199 >> RX bytes:78438 (76.5 Kb) TX bytes:1100 (1.0 Kb) >> Interrupt:9 Memory:e08ee000-e08fe000 >> >> ...Over 1000 packets were received (with over 2000 errors!?), yet >> only 22 were sent. Why? > > > ... therefor these isn't much your card could send out (to whom should > it send data). On the other hand, that doesn't stop your card from > seeing packets from others. The high number of errors is assumably > caused by the bad signals you have from the above two APs. > >> ath0 Fixed period ; min timeout:67.1078s >> max timeout:1.024ms > > > Note to the devs: shouldn't this be the other way round, thus "min > timeout: 1.024ms, max timeout 67.1078s"? > > Bye, Mike > I supposed I need a new antenna. Can anyone recommend one? I believe the WG311T has a MMCX connector. Mike: Sorry, I didn't realize I replied directly to you. "Where are replies to list messages directed?" should be set to "This list", IMHO. |