From: Per Kristian Gjermshus <pkg@ne...> - 2001-11-22 08:12:03
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 23:04, Arne Georg Gleditsch wrote:
> Patch follows. Note though, that the way I've implemented this seems
> to require Swish-E newer than the currently stable 2.0.5. This might
> or might not be a problem. Anyway, have a look at it.
I tried the non-development version during the weekend and found the
indexer to be extremely slow. It used a lot of memory, and made my
machine crawl under heavy swappping. It actually took so long that I
never got around to start writing any code for using Swish-E, so it's
great that you got around to do it.