Re: [Lxde-list] Unify razor and lxde, current progress and plans

[PCMan <pcm...@gm...>]

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Stephan Sokolow
<gma...@sp...> wrote:
> Hmm. Well, in that case, I suppose my only complaint is that I find even
> Bugzilla to have a more comfortable UI than SourceForge's issue tracker.
>
> (Bugzilla may have quite the learning curve, but once I got used to it,
> I found it comfortable. SourceForge's issue tracker just never seems to
> get comfortable.)
>
> However, keep in mind that, by bringing my mistaken assumption to your
> attention so you could correct it, I've become part of a small minority
> of users.
>
> Unless SourceForge somehow makes a clean break between whatever they
> currently offer and their old bug tracker in peoples' minds, it's a
> problem that's going to drag on willingness to participate among
> potential new community members.
>
> (The "if you need to personally respond to clarify/correct something",
> then the solution is broken because there will be many others who are
> affected and don't contact you about it." principle.)
>
> On 13-07-28 06:17 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
>>      Hello!
>>
>> Stephan Sokolow has written on Saturday, 27 July, at 22:12:
>>> ...plus, the fact that SourceForge automatically closes bugs that have
>>> lain dormant for too long is a major discouragement and smacks of
>>> assuming that everyone wants the CADT model.
>>
>>      First, SourceForge closed the bugs only marked as Pending, not Open
>> ones. Second, it doesn't do that for long enough time, I marked few bugs
>> as Pending last year and they were never closed. I suppose they got few
>> requests to disable the feature so they've disabled it.
>>
>>      Cheers!
>>      Andriy.

I'm going to attend an open source conference and give a speech on Aug 3.
People from our local open source communities will go there and I'll
meet some friends there.
If I can find someone to host bugzilla for us, I mean our own server,
is this acceptable for you guys?