2013/9/3 Martin Bagge / brother <brother@bsnet.se>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2013-09-03 15:19, Sérgio Marques wrote:
> I assume this is already the case. If the original string has a
> dot, the translated should also carry that (or something else if
> your language uses it different...)
>
> Could be. But look at this one.

Case in point. Thanks. You proved my point.

> "Failed to parse '%-.*s', which should have been a digit inside a
> character reference (&#234; for example) - perhaps the digit is too
> large"
>
> I think that this one deserves an ending dot. Maybe I´m wrong.

You addressed ALL strings. Both with and without dots. That's a very
hard thing to do. The above might be an oversight and those are more
interesting.

Agreed. All strings is generic.

I think I will leave them as original ones.

 
I just wanted to highlight the possible thought that strings with dots
where supposed to have them and strings without might be supposed to
not have them.
If that was not the case we would be in trouble and the above bug
report would not even be possible to file.

- --
brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSJeLsAAoJEJbdSEaj0jV78l4IAITgZXE3r+5H3dJ17uuI16CI
fM7wmLaWqMewtlrTl5no8kc+e8S/kl017KHa3/jT45o+jNEJb6HOEiPWFAGvO+fp
sWoBx3v//Bsmg+hTOHvebrbVJSNJCXfhitFRQNCZNvhqfFbxpAZf/D9pXxr5Bchw
lpS1MirNemArUXL7JF4y0PWH+UkoHG3wRa5Qm/7pWktydGfk5wa0kSnM7tD+KltQ
XXn4oaOPqbhGSd+ep0zynOxV4SlZlJqIYDmcR+kKDpFigElAf5sF8jaHx14PdzFP
8vO/nVykNinS1z66g16Z6IaqYAy9HYEIvXUH/DqaTbJ3NF/TknrdZkfmSQ9Taz4=
=Oyso
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
Sérgio Marques