Re: [Lush-devel] Unstable files/documentation & package formats

[Yann L. <ya...@le...>]

> > Why not simply making a CVS branch. This exactly what it does...
>
> Of course you can do that with CVS, but in my opinion it is something of a
> hassle when you are just doing quick and dirty stuff. In the case of the
> documentation, I might have just one file changed that I want to put up
> where everyone one can get at it. Perhaps I will get numerous feedback
> about typos and such which can be updated quickly, but serve little purpose
> in CVS for revision control.
>
> The sourceforge project file web interface just seems a little more
> accessible for this purpose.

One issue is to allow multiple people to update the documentation in a
way that might make it temporarily inconsistent, without messing up
the main CVS version.  As Leon suggests, a new CVS branch is exactly
what we need for that.  CVS is by far the simplest mechanism for
making quick updates available to others: edit a thefile, do "cvs
commit thefile", that's it. Everyone who does "cvs update" in their
local copy of the branch directory will get the changes.

> I am not trying to complicate issues by my suggestion and perhaps this is
> not the way things have traditionally been done. Maybe a little change in
> packaging/file management/availability will open things up to more
> participation. 

There is definitely a need for opening things up to participation,
particularly when it comes to documentation.... 

  -- Yann