Re: [LTP] Signal delivery order

[Michael K. <mtk...@go...>]

[...]

>> So I'm not sure that Gabor's tests would be useful in LTP.
>
> Thanks for explaining the rationale in the test. With contribution(s) to
> LTP being very less in terms of new tests, i think it is a good idea to
> look through LKML, if developers are writing some unit test(s), and then
> evaluate their worthiness to be made part of LTP. I would rather fall
> back on you guys, who have regular interface to LKML to help me in
> deciding that.

No problem!

> Thanks very much. I would not pursue with this test
> further.

Glad to help.

Cheers,

Michael