From: Gerrit H. <ge...@us...> - 2001-06-14 00:51:30
|
So if I read this correctly, this suggests that if I buy 8 CPUs for my machine, I used to get the equivalent of one and one third CPUs worth of throughput on my machine, and now I'm up to getting the equivalent of three and a half CPUs worth of work down with this benchmark? So this is definitely dramatic improvement, but what keeps this benchmark from getting me the equivalent of, say, 7.5 or 8 CPUs worth of work out of this benchmark? Obviously the scheduler is in the way - what's the next bottleneck visible on the performance highway? gerrit > Throughput results reported are messages/second. > Scaling results are relative to UP. > > 2.4.4 2.4.4 2.4.4+MQ > 8M/64M 64M/64M 64M/64M > Throughput: > UP 12593 13123 13123* > 4P 19748 22331 29440 > 8P 16693 18677 46166 > Scaling : > 4P 1.57 1.70 2.24 > 8P 1.33 1.42 3.52 |