Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Lse-tech] [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-testX regression run results
|
From: Andrew M. <ak...@os...> - 2003-08-22 21:07:05
|
Gack, what happened to reiserfs? http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/history-graphs/dbench.reiser.throughput.plot.16.png Steven Pratt <sl...@au...> wrote: > > Mark Peloquin wrote: > > > Been awhile since results where posted, therefore this is a little long. > > > > > > Nightly Regression Summary for 2.6.0-test3 vs 2.6.0-test3-mm3 > > > > Benchmark Pass/Fail Improvements Regressions > > Results Results Summary > > --------------- --------- ------------ ----------- > > ----------- ----------- ------- > > dbench.ext2 P N N 2.6.0-test3 > > 2.6.0-test3-mm3 report > > dbench.ext3 P N Y 2.6.0-test3 > > 2.6.0-test3-mm3 report > > The ext3 dbench regression is very significant for multi threaded 193 -> > 118. Looks like this regression first showed up in mm1 and does not > exist in any of the bk trees. > > http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/history-graphs/dbench.ext3.throughput.plot.16.png > > > > > volanomark P N Y 2.6.0-test3 > > 2.6.0-test3-mm3 report > > Volanomark is significant as well. 10% drop in mm tree. This one also > appeared to show up in mm1 although it was a 14% drop then so mm3 > actually looks a little better. There were build errors on mm2 run so I > don't have that data at this time. > Following link illustrates the drop in mm tree for volanomark. > > http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/history-graphs/volanomark.throughput.plot.1.png > > > SpecJBB2000 for high warehouses also took a bit hit. Probably the same > root cause as volanomark. > Here is the history plot for the 19 warehouse run. > > http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/history-graphs/specjbb.results.avg.plot.19.png > > Huge spike in idle time. > http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/history-graphs/specjbb.utilization.idle.avg.plot.19.png > > > > > http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.6.0-test3-mm3/2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3/ > > > > > Steve > |
