Re: [Lprng-devel] modified manpages

[Bernhard R. L. <br...@de...>]

* walter harms <wh...@bf...> [061207 09:29]:
> part 1 of spellchecked and improved pages
> (note the new contact notice)

I've some questions about those:

1) Why do you add those \"$Id$ at the start of every manpage?
(I guess we would have to switch keyword replacement back on
in those files to make use of it, which I has to switch of
to not confuse CVS about the changing id lines of the imported
files). Do you think adding an id is usefull there? Wouldn't it
be better to always increment the date when doing changes?

2) The new files now all seem to speak about -D in the diagnostics
part, but monitor for example does not seem to support -D from a quick
glance at the source code.

3) Speaking about monitor, it seems the program is only compiled but by
default not installed. I'd guess it might be sensible to not install the
manpage by default either. I think we should add looking for other such
cases to some TODO list...

Hochachtungsvoll,
	Bernhard R. Link
-- 
"Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools are available!"
	Niklaus Wirth