From: Mark F. <mf...@va...> - 2000-11-26 01:30:33
|
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 04:15:14PM -0800, Ben Woodard wrote: > Where is Mark P's printcap writing routines? If they're not in the .3 tarball, they'll have to be added. At least this way, we have a base version in a centralized location which can be patched up to include all the features developed recently. > > Why don't we rename the functions and structrures so that they are now > "gnulpr" but rather "lps"? > > Also, how does this sound to people? Right now we don't have anything > that uses libprintsys in gnulpr. Why don't we stave off converting > everything until the 1.1 release? Then in the 1.1 release we will: > > 1) introduce gpanda > 2) introduce libprintsys > 3) introduce gprintool > 4) convert gpr to using libprintsys > 5) convert the spooler to using libprintsys If you indeed want to make a 1.0 release by the end of this month, it seems that this might make the most sense. That way you can concentrate on the release, rather than rushing everything in these last couple of days. > > -ben > > > libprintsys (0.3) has been added to the gnulpr repository, under > > bens_dev_branch. > > --Mark > > > > -- > > If we were meant to get up early, God would have created us with alarm clocks. > > Mark James Fasheh <mf...@va...> > > VA Linux Systems Professional Services > > http://www.exothermic.org > > _______________________________________________ > > Lpr-discuss mailing list > > Lpr...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/lpr-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lpr-discuss mailing list > Lpr...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/lpr-discuss -- If we were meant to get up early, God would have created us with alarm clocks. Mark James Fasheh <mf...@va...> VA Linux Systems Professional Services http://www.exothermic.org |