Re: [Lmuse-user] Test of build and run of MusE on Athlon-64...

[Robert J. <spa...@gm...>]

Hey Daniel,

You're the man, will check out the fix tonight.

Seems SF has changed something so the mailforwarding for our bug tracker no
longer works... sucks.

Regards,
Robert


2009/12/10 Daniel Kobras <ko...@li...>

> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:10:14PM +0000, Viktor Mastoridis wrote:
> > > anyone using 64-bit, especially Ubuntu 9.10,
> > >  (esp. Victor you still out there?)
> > >  please tell me if you use
> > >  --enable-arch=***64 or --enable-optimize
> > >  configure options.
> > >
> >
> > I didn't compile, as I mentioned. I just used the installed, repository
> > version. I can compile it and will report in due time, but I thought that
> > it's weird that the 'official', pre-installed Muse (0.8) wouldn't start
> at
> > all. That's why I reported it.
>
> What you're seeing is a longstanding bug in muse (up to 1.0rc3) that
> corrupts
> some memory structures on 64bit platforms. It triggers a new, stricter
> check in
> glibc 2.10 that makes the program crash during startup already. A change in
> muse 1.0rc4 avoids the crash. A more comprehensive fix is in Debian
> unstable
> and
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2907812&group_id=93414&atid=604224
> I'm not sure whether the fixed package found its way into Ubuntu already.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Return on Information:
> Google Enterprise Search pays you back
> Get the facts.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Lmuse-user mailing list
> Lmu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user
>