> Fr=E5n: ws@...
> Till: gavel@...
> Rubrik: [Lmuse-developer] Re: todo-numbering
> Datum: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:00:09 +0000
> On Thursday 20 October 2005 20:37, Mathias Lundgren wrote:
> > Hi, this is a question for you, Werner-mann:
> > I'm just wondering what the general idea with the TODO-numbering is.
> > I've seen TODO1, TODO2 and TODO3, and I figure that it has to do with
> > priority. The question is if it has to do with order (first do TODO1.=
> > or a scale of how important they are (TODO3 > TODO1 and thus TODO3 mo=
> > important). If I would have to bet money on it I would bet on order, =
> > scale.
> > The other question is if you're planning to do these things yourself,=
> > if you've left those messages there for people like me to dig into? :=
> > /Mathias
> there is nothing special with TODO-numbers. They are only simple text
> i can easy grep for.
> For example in the process of porting the code to Qt4 i commented out a=
> functionality in order to get the whole thing compilable again.
> All commented out code is marked with "TD" so i can find and fix this
> later on.
> TODO's without a number tend to mark real problems or missing code. And
> of them are there a long time...
> If you are looking for TODO's there is plenty left in the porting proce=
> starting with simple changing all "s.latin1()" calls to
> or replacing all *.ui3 files with *.ui ones (the current snapshot uic3=20
> generates bad code). Goal is to get rid of the Qt3 compatibility librar=
> Other things look more complicated like how to implement list header it=
> (not only separators) or how to implement multi column pulldown menus.
> I'm currently working on getting the controller editors working again.=20
> Its more complicated and time consuming than i first thought. There are
> also some issues with the qt4 lib which are fixed in the current qt
> (which has other problems :-( ) which costs extra time.
I'm just trying to port the popup menus which currently needs some change=
s when it comes to the checking behaviour (and menu title). I'm simply tr=
ying to stick to the same behaviour as previously, hope you don't have pl=
ans for any new changes here.