Re: [LMMS-devel] bpm

 Re: [LMMS-devel] bpm From: Thorsten Wilms - 2006-03-29 18:32:49 ```On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:21:51PM +0200, Alexander Schussler wrote: > Now there is a weird proposal...How to you produce 114.3 beats per > minute...is that like producing 114 beats in a minute and trying for > 115 but missing it...??!??!?!?!...:P I can't beleive I have ever heard a > request like this ever before...cool! It's not weird at all. You can have a speed of 120.35 km/h, why not not 120.35 BPM? I have drumloops that are cleary not in exact integer BPM, but require at least one digit behind the dot precision to loop clean. 2 Digits behind the dot seem to be quite common for sequencers. Cheers, Thorsten Wilms ```

 [LMMS-devel] bpm From: GegSite - 2006-03-29 15:44:26 ```Hi ! I think that it could be very useful if we could the BPM change to 114.3 instead of 114 or 113 ! p.s.: New screen shots and download page ? Gegsite=0A=0A______________________________________________________________= ___________=0ADigit=E1lis f=E9nyk=E9pez=F5g=E9pek rendk=EDv=FCli csomagaj= =E1nlatokkal, fot=F3kidolgoz=E1s m=E1r 25,- Ft-t=F3l=0AFotoMarket, m=E1r 5 = =E9ve az =D6n fot=F3szolg=E1lat=E1ban! http://www.fotomarket.hu=0A=0A ```
 Re: [LMMS-devel] bpm From: Alexander Schussler - 2006-03-29 18:21:14 ```Now there is a weird proposal...How to you produce 114.3 beats per minute...is that like producing 114 beats in a minute and trying for 115 but missing it...??!??!?!?!...:P I can't beleive I have ever heard a request like this ever before...cool! On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 05:45:36PM +0200, GegSite wrote: > Hi ! >=20 > I think that it could be very useful if we could the BPM > change to 114.3 instead of 114 or 113 ! >=20 > p.s.: New screen shots and download page ? >=20 > Gegsite >=20 > _________________________________________________________________________ > Digit=E1lis f=E9nyk=E9pez?g=E9pek rendk=EDv=FCli csomagaj=E1nlatokkal, fo= t=F3kidolgoz=E1s m=E1r 25,- Ft-t=F3l > FotoMarket, m=E1r 5 =E9ve az =D6n fot=F3szolg=E1lat=E1ban! http://www.fotomarket= .hu >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting langua= ge > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webc= ast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territor= y! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=110944&bid\$1720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMMS-devel@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel --=20 ```
 Re: [LMMS-devel] bpm From: Thorsten Wilms - 2006-03-29 18:32:49 ```On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:21:51PM +0200, Alexander Schussler wrote: > Now there is a weird proposal...How to you produce 114.3 beats per > minute...is that like producing 114 beats in a minute and trying for > 115 but missing it...??!??!?!?!...:P I can't beleive I have ever heard a > request like this ever before...cool! It's not weird at all. You can have a speed of 120.35 km/h, why not not 120.35 BPM? I have drumloops that are cleary not in exact integer BPM, but require at least one digit behind the dot precision to loop clean. 2 Digits behind the dot seem to be quite common for sequencers. Cheers, Thorsten Wilms ```
 Re: [LMMS-devel] bpm From: Lucas - 2006-03-29 21:31:25 ```> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:21:51PM +0200, Alexander Schussler wrote: >> Now there is a weird proposal...How to you produce 114.3 beats per >> minute...is that like producing 114 beats in a minute and trying for >> 115 but missing it...??!??!?!?!...:P I can't beleive I have ever heard a >> request like this ever before...cool! > > It's not weird at all. > You can have a speed of 120.35 km/h, why not not 120.35 BPM? > > I have drumloops that are cleary not in exact integer BPM, but > require at least one digit behind the dot precision to loop clean. > 2 Digits behind the dot seem to be quite common for sequencers. Exactly, this can be very useful if you're trying to remix something. Say you only have an a capella file, and don't want to use the stretching function because of artifacts(don't know if LMMS even has it). Lucas ```
 Re: [LMMS-devel] bpm From: Alexander Schussler - 2006-03-29 22:00:21 ```Mmmmkay! I guess I stand corrected...;) However a request of importence to me I feel is the ability to connect the controllers of the soft-synths to midi-controllers..is this coming along or have I missed that it already works. Doesn't seem like anything happens when I try right-clicking a nob and choosing the midi-connection feature for it. Anyone? /Alex On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:31:36PM +0200, Lucas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:21:51PM +0200, Alexander Schussler wrote: > >> Now there is a weird proposal...How to you produce 114.3 beats per > >> minute...is that like producing 114 beats in a minute and trying for > >> 115 but missing it...??!??!?!?!...:P I can't beleive I have ever heard a > >> request like this ever before...cool! > > > > It's not weird at all. > > You can have a speed of 120.35 km/h, why not not 120.35 BPM? > > > > I have drumloops that are cleary not in exact integer BPM, but > > require at least one digit behind the dot precision to loop clean. > > 2 Digits behind the dot seem to be quite common for sequencers. > > Exactly, this can be very useful if you're trying to remix something. Say you only > have an a capella file, and don't want to use the stretching function because of > artifacts(don't know if LMMS even has it). > > Lucas > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMMS-devel@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel -- ```