From: David G. <dg...@gm...> - 2014-01-10 10:29:38
|
On 10 January 2014 08:34, Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm...> wrote: > To be clear: not the old master branch but either a new one we're going to > create or even better: stable-0.4! Otherwise the patches won't apply. > IMHO we should go away from the concept of stable and development branches. > Instead there should be one branch where stabilized feature branches get > merged in. Every N weeks there should be a release. Of course we can still > provide an experimental branch where all feature branches regularly get > merged in (for users wanting to use bleeding edge unstable LMMS) but > development should not happen against this experimental/master branch. Excellent! Will the distro package maintainers be able to keep up with this? (Will the distros let them?) - d. |