Milestones are ideal for this I think

On 3 Mar 2014 16:24, "Vesa" <dii.dii@nbl.fi> wrote:
On 03/03/2014 04:11 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> Would it be sufficient to use milestones at Github for this?
>
>

I just think it'd be convenient to gather all of it in one place (not
only because it'd be something we could reference when users ask "when
is ___ getting implemented"), and we could include things that may not
be necessary to include in github yet.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel