lius-devp

[Lius-devp] Fwd:New Lius Indexer framework

[Rida B. <bi...@he...>]

Hi Jens,
I totally agree with your UML. It is perfect and respects the 
orientation that I want to give to Lius.
Very good job :-).
Olso we can add WebDavStreamProvider, I had some discussion this week-
end with frensh colleagues that has implements into Lius WebDav 
indexing, they told me that they are ready to contribute buy adding this 
module to Lius.
Olso they are ready to add webservice search capability into Lius.
I olso start thinking and testing intranet indexing using http, so I’m 
verry happy to see that your UML represent it.

I olso start thinking about indexing JCR (Java Content Repository) or 
JSR 170.

I have add some classes in red into your UML.

How mixteIndexing will work, actually we index files, JavaBeans and 
nodes, mixte indexing allow indexing directory and store it in a single 
Lucene document. This is very useful when we want to index for example 
XML file containing metadata and fulltext in the same time. In the new 
UML  I’can’t  see clearly how it will works ?

Best regards and thanks for this great job.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jens Fendler <jf...@te...>
To: liu...@li...
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:16:42 +0200
Subject: New Lius Indexer framework

> Hi all..
> 
> Despite the problem of finding a proper configuration approach, I've
> UML-ized 
> my thoughts regarding a restructuring of the indexer framework in order
> to 
> support heterogeneous data sources.
> 
> Please have a look at the provided diagram and tell me what you think..
> 
> -- 
> .O.  Jens Fendler
> ..O  jf...@te...
> OOO  http://www.teamskill.de
> 

Re: [Lius-devp] Fwd:New Lius Indexer framework

[Jens F. <jf...@te...>]

Hi Rida..

> Olso we can add WebDavStreamProvider, I had some discussion this week-
> end with frensh colleagues that has implements into Lius WebDav
> indexing, they told me that they are ready to contribute buy adding this
> module to Lius.

I don't have any experience with webdav (except for having heard the name).=
=20
But if it fits.. we'll go for it.

> Olso they are ready to add webservice search capability into Lius.
> I olso start thinking and testing intranet indexing using http, so I=92m
> verry happy to see that your UML represent it.

:-)

> I olso start thinking about indexing JCR (Java Content Repository) or
> JSR 170.

again, I'm not familiar with it. I'll have a look at it when time permits.=
=20
could you sketch the content for me?

> I have add some classes in red into your UML.

looks good.. I'm not sure whether we can agree on a UML tool to use for=20
drawing - which would make it more easy to share such diagrams. I'm=20
(voluntarily) restricted to Linux here and would suggest something like 'di=
a'=20
but it's probably not the best choice for the windows world. can you think =
of=20
anything that everybody could use in a similar way?=20
the only (good) Java tool I have seen is 'Poseidon UML' but I'm not sure if=
=20
they still offer a freeware version..
if you have anything in your bookmarks you can recommend: let me know :-)
otherwise we'll just stick to drawing JPEGs for now..

> How mixteIndexing will work, actually we index files, JavaBeans and
> nodes, mixte indexing allow indexing directory and store it in a single
> Lucene document. This is very useful when we want to index for example
> XML file containing metadata and fulltext in the same time. In the new
> UML  I=92can=92t  see clearly how it will works ?

As I wrote I have omitted most of the Indexer interface methods. I think we=
=20
can mostly reuse the available code from the current version after a little=
=20
refactoring to comply with the new design..

> Best regards and thanks for this great job.

which was not really a lot of work but thank you very much for your=20
appreciation!

cu,
	jens

=2D-=20
=2EO.  Jens Fendler
=2E.O  jf...@te...
OOO  http://www.teamskill.de