Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] LDM vista patch testing
Development moved to https://sourceforge.net/projects/ntfs-3g/
Brought to you by:
antona,
cha0smaster
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2007-03-09 19:31:03
|
On 9 Mar 2007, at 00:22, Kazz wrote: > I should have thought of that...heh. :) Well, here's the whole dmesg > output anyway. Right now I think the SFS disks are /dev/sdb-sde. The > other disk used to be sde, but it seems to have moved to sda...heh. > [ 10.432000] sdb:<3>ldm_parse_privhead(): Expected PRIVHEAD > version 2.11, got 2.12. As it is only a minor version difference we > are continuing anyway in the hope that th > [ 10.468000] ldm_parse_privhead(): Expected PRIVHEAD version > 2.11, got 2.12. As it is only a minor version difference we are > continuing anyway in the hope that th > [ 10.488000] ldm_parse_privhead(): Expected PRIVHEAD version > 2.11, got 2.12. As it is only a minor version difference we are > continuing anyway in the hope that th > [ 10.504000] ldm_parse_tocblock(): Cannot find TOCBLOCK, database > may be corrupt. > [ 10.504000] sdb1 > [ 10.504000] sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdb Ok, this is odd. There must be more complex changes from 2.11 to 2.12 version. This is unfortunately probably not going to be easy to fix without me (or someone else) looking at the LDM data directly and figuring it out... I am afraid I have other commitments at the moment and do not have the time to do it so unless someone else wants to do it I am afraid you are stuck with using XP only LDM on Linux, sorry. Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ |